I agree completely.  But can't you see I have already offered bitcoins out of my pocket and NUGs and nothing has been done.  I have offered a $1,000 new diesel jacket to anyone who does a major job.

WTF do you want me to do Mark that I haven't already done.  Every Board I've been on the miners do most of the bounty payouts not the devs so how can you already call me a politician.

And on top of all that I've already set aside $1,000 for a coin design by a pro and the help from a PhD forensic computer scientist.  And if you think I'm lying, but I haven't yet so you should give me the benefit of the doubt, I will get his precision to publish some of his white papers and thesis work and maybe a picture.  His fees for corps are up in the $300 per hour but my bro things he'll help me for $20 per hour.

Pebble, is I don't know what a forensic guy knows about this stuff and C++, maybe you can give me an idea.

And finally, there's an exchange open yet I haven't sold a single coin.  R3 and programmer X both know my wallet addresses and can see I'm telling the truth.

So far I've done more for this coin, given its been just 3 days than any dev I've seen and I'm broke.  What do you want from me.  I am literally doing all I can with what I have to work.  I'm now bountying my favorite diesel jacket.  Doesn't that mean anything to you people?  Have you seen anyone work that hard to keep his coin working?

It would be cheaper and easier for me to dump all my coins, start a new name from Europe and in 60 days launch a new con.  It would be wayyyy cheaper.  You're being unfair expecting me to move maintains when I'm on a limited budget and I'm being more than fair and generous yet I'm getting ZERO help from those who can program.  


Devs are nothing by policitivisns but so far everything I have done I clouding the smack talking has been the exact opposite.  A scammer would be kissing ass and never insult anyone.  Obviously care more about what's right and fighting against the lies against me than I care about a popular coin or money so that's the opposite of a politician.

Cut me a break, give me credit for what I've done and am trying to do given i have limited resources and lets get the community involved end where I can pay bounties I'll lay what I can afford.

Cause 50,000 NUGs were nothing and one jerk laughed at that so I doubled it and at 100.000 NUGs for small jobs there will bomb eh left Ina ,after of days.

So no, I will not get o,shed. I will pay the same proportion in pay as other coins like ixCoin, devcoin and so on which in dollar terms comes out to nothing and that's the meaning of open source.  Don't expect me to pay every dime in my account for small jobs - people will have to help be see they naive in this coin and if not then let it die.  Me, I believe but there's only so much I can do and from looking around, coins which have a huge market cap compared to mine pay pitiful pitiful bounties.

I'll go on record and say that if my coin was worth $3 I would pay very generous bounties so much so that every dev would be forced to quadruple their bounties.  But nobody does that cause they're colluding to get professional programming for jr high school pay.  I will not do that but now I'm at the begining and I have little so there's gonna have to be some give and take.  Snow me just 1 dev show is trying as hard as me or has breaks host or generous as me.  

When the programmer X had the program running I offered to pay him nearly double even though I paid him in full already.  He declined to accept.  I did the same thing with r3.  The same with the guy who wasn't a programmer.  Most people I have paid my heart went out and I raised their pay for no reason even they were happy with the pay we agreed with.  

How many devs who are broke do you know to be that generous in secrecy and for no reason - just cause they feel it on their heart, I've seen none nearly double an already spendy bounty when rant guy was plenty happy with the bounty.  That what generosity is and you can't pretend to be generous - it's in the heart end it comes out end it's like you not even stop yourself and its right and it feels good.  But if you're broke and just starting our its just not possible.

If I'm doing that now when I'm so broke what do you think I'll do if I start making money.  Trust me - I will forever change the lay stricture for all devs and for all bounties because its eight and if you have a good coin you should share the wealth you cheap selfish bastards.

So I'm sorry, but I cannot put out more financial support than I have and for some of the bounties like .2 BTC to start a pool where they will make all the money not me is a fair bounty.  The .25 BTC to just copy and paste some code is more than fair. Compared to what I have seen on other boards these no tore re fair and when you consider I'm all alone and this is a new coin those bounties are actually generous.

This is open source, why don't some of you that know real programming help a single struggling. Dev who 's not a pump and dump scamming politician.  Lets be real scammers don't do what I do they do the opposite . Kiss assesses, never offend a hone, hide their IDE identity, pay little to no bounties, beg for bounties (ok I've asked for help chide that's how it works), promise stuff that's never gonna happen, dump their coins the second an exchange shows up.

I don't fit the scammer profile to the least bit.  You want a new breed of devs, then I'm it. And the nature if quick money of crypto-coin will not bring people like me in.  I'm a anomaly and I came in case I saw devcoin and ixCoin as the next bitcoin 2.0 and Bitcoin 3.0 but then when I saw what shitty coin were putting out and nobody said anything it made me angry and I said, I can do better than that and I'm not even a dev.

I'm asking for trust and for help just Because I'm the exact opposite of the devs here by far, I don't have one bone in my body like theirs..  If you get rid of me you'll never get a true guy like me ever again.  You'll be stuck with used car salesman types and selfish pumpers looking for a quick buck.  You'll miss the days when a guy trying to launch a coin wasn't afraid to insult the biggest most popular guy on here if he thought he was in the right and did everything even sold the clothes on his back to make this coin work.  Trust me man, guys like me just don't exist in the money world.  If this coin fails its not gonna be cause I didn't try I will give i all I got but I will not be a sucker and pay 3 times what other established devs pay with budgets 10 times what I have.  That would be stupid of me and I simply can't afford it.  The bounties i set so far are fair - more than fair in some cases.

Thanks for the advice and good luck.

There are only so many hashing machines out there, every one that goes chasing yet another new coin is that much less secure the money the community already has is.

Since we already cannot secure even just the first two or three scrypt based chains that we have, adding yet more scrypt based chains just makes the situation worse not better.

As it is the first two, Tenebrix and Fairbrix, are ridiculously insecure because a third one, Litecoin, came along and most of the miners of Tenebrix and Fairbrix seem to have jumped to that chain.

I am not even sure offhand what the fourth scrypt based chain was, but even after having seen that there was not enough hashing power to secure the three chains we already had, I am pretty sure the fourth scrypt chain did not add merged mining; if it has then that at least it would not cause even more burden upon the community.

In the SHA256 world, where it had already been seen that every bit of hashing diverted to secure Namecoin was that much less security for Bitcoin, the Namecoin dev implemented merged mining, allowing the community not only to secure the second SHA256 chain, Namecoin, without diverting hashing power from Bitcoin but also to even manage to at least partially secure, albeit to a not really all that satisfactory degree, another chain or few.

Even with merged mining though, even just Namecoin is still not really all that secure compared to Bitcoin, and both Ixcoin and Devcoin are even less secure than Namecoin.

So far only one scrypt chain that I know of has even tried to implement merged mining, as the whole basis of the recent spawning of scrypt clones and spinoffs seems to be to deliberately force anyone who wants to support them to withdraw support from the community's existing chains, whether by diverting GPUs from the SHA256 chains (which, originally, was far from the intention of the first of the scrypt coins) or by diverting hashing from existing scrypt coins. To this day one still cannot merged mine Tenebrix and Fairbrix and Litecoin, for example.

The security problem gets worse and worse as more and more chains are spawned that cannot be merged mined.

So all your "giving the shirt off your back" stuff pretty much just comes across as you are so determined to weaken the community's security that you will give your favourite truck and your favourite jacket in return for what you imagine will be a really great attempt at undermining the community's security even farther than it has already been undermined.

How about offering your truck and/or your jacket to anyone who will implement merged mining of Tenebrix, Fairbrix and Litecoin, the original scrypt coins, so that all the others can optionally also upgrade to being able to participate in such merges, so that at least if someone else does spawn yet another scamcoin they need not force its miners to undermine the security of the community's wealth in order to help them pull off their get rich quick scheme?

-MarkM-

Or here is another useful idea: get the ability to be "themed" added to more and more bitcoin clients, so that anyone who thinks a soccer mom theme or a catholic theme or a 200 years ago gold miner theme or whatever will increase adoption or be popular or whatever can theme a reasonably secure chain, a reasonably valuable currency, to target their target audience instead of scamming their target audience with a house-of-cards ridiculously insecure pyramid scheme ponzi tulip-mania scam?

Luke might be a loony religious nut about his Tonal Bitcoin but it is as secure as Bitcoin and maintains a stable exchange rate vs Bitcoin, imagine how awesome Soccercoin or Catholiccoin or whatever would be if they were worth exactly as much as Bitcoin and were exactly as secure as Bitcoin and didn't even need an exchange in order to be used to pay people who want Bitcoin or Soccercoin or Catholiccoin or whatever because they are all actually just different "themes", different "lingo", different views, onto the same underlying blockchain.

Like "bread", "dough", "greenbacks" etc etc, just different target audiences all referring to the same thing...

-MarkM-

You say devs did nothing for you, that's false. Experienced people have explained in here over and over why your coin was DOA, both from an execution POV and a conceptual POV. They really spent a lot of time trying to help, but you don't want to listen, wasting everybody's time in the process.

You just spend 95% of your time posting useless things like your family history, and then you complain you don't have time to read posts on your own thread that are addressing the problems of your coin? That's the very problem you need to address, if you just cut all the crap out by now you would know how to copy and paste the buggy line of code in the right place. Just check this crapcoin for dummies guide, in the time that it takes you to write 3 TL;DR posts you will have learnt how to fix the code yourself and push the changes to github.


You are way beyond delusional. Nobody thinks that people will finally get stuff done for this coin if you go away. If you do step out this thread will finally die, hopefully a mod will lock it for good, and you know why? Because your coin is just another poorly executed useless clone, there's nothing worth saving in it. Among the thousands of lines you have posted in this thread, there is not a single reason why "this coin is different", or why "it deserves saving".

You have repeated the same pattern since day 1 you registered in the forum. Your first 40 posts are about how it was possible for people to be mining LTC with only a few kh/s or mh/s, because you didn't understand that different hash function results in different hash rate with the same hardware. In between your 40 rambling posts people did try to explain you why they could mine litecoin with just a few MH/s, but still you didn't read a single post for days, you just went on rambling.

As I said earlier, you are either one of the biggest trolls ever or you have a serious mental problem, mate.

Right, they're gonna lock my thread for taking a 2-3. Day break.  Lol, look around there's threads with no posts for 2 years and are not locked.

I too think this thread will die without me.  I was e preferring to those who were c,aiming the coin was dying cause I'm on this thread driving away talent and people who wanna help.  I think I am this thread and with me gone to will die fast.  So see, we agree for once.

But you can at least mine XRP with less resources.

Cheers

@Rampion, you sir, have all my respect.. You are still trying.

Cheers

Wouldn't it be cool if this was actually a thread started by a MasterTroll?

By the way it looks like who-ever controls the github repo has mined the whole chain over again so that their new code's bonus blocks, that start immediately after block 250, are not found to be in error when someone starts up a new node and starts getting the blockchain.

Presumably they have been getting all the bonus blocks from block 251 through block 1805 so far, and are throwing enough hashes at it that my puny 255 kilohashes can only get orphans.

-MarkM-