By the way, I noticed that nowhere in the documents did find mention of the possibility of consultation with a living doctor. I think that they should add this opportunity. Make it an additional service at a specific time of day for each time zone and different countries. Let this opportunity will cost more than usual diagnostics. At the same time, doctors could receive some payment from the platform for their consultations.
I think this is already planned, as far as i know. There were big concerns about this and I think the team changed that aspect already to be implemented.
Yes, you are right about it. Actually it can be something we can rely on in the future but for now, we need real doctors.
In my opinion, i think the real doctors can never be replaced by computers, so a doctor consultation will always be needed (about advanced/further solution/information)
There are some things that AI cant copy.
I see it more like an advice. Like: Hey you got these and these symptomes which might relate to this sickness - better get checked for that.
No matter where you look at this project - in the end it says: always get a real doctor. So the team is taking care of that and does not see the blockchain
+ AI as a full replacement for a doctor. We're far far away from that technology. But EHF might bring us a big step closer to that.
I agree. Doctors would even fight eHealth if they felt threatened by the project but it will just be a great complementary tool for patients and doctors.
The AI components is NECESSARY, AI can check your data, and compare it with data from other patient or people, or from a big database to reference and extrapolate your information, and bring closer a better diagnose for your particular case, this will HELP doctors immensely, so you get the most accurate diagnosis possible for the condition you have, be it just a cold, or a disease you didn't know you could have, or your doctor, so the AI component is essential.
