I think it doesn't have too much sense to do something like that for this project because in the case of giving bad advice could affect the reputation of the platform.

I agree, I think eHealth should stick to professional doctors whose credibility could be verified. Otherwise, the platform would be taking on a big risk, it's simply not worth it.

Absolutely. I'm all for collecting the data of individuals but the interpretation of it should be up to doctors.

I hope with the development of this project, cases of self will be much less! And the level of health care will increase!

trying new ideas and approaches in medicine is what helps. that's why this platform will be a benefit if the dev's manage to develop it properly.

in which way could it harm?

Indeed, it's better than just looking at their pictures. You get to know them a bit better. 

Very interesting to see all the introduction videos. To me this is a much better introduction to the project then their official ICO intro (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebXOmPnUOac), which seems a bit cheesy even though the project and team members are so high level and such professionals. I think this is a clear case where not a lot of time and money is spend yet on the marketing, but more focus on actual work on the project. For early investors this is good, it rewards investors who actually did the research.

Not yet, most likely after 17th of March unless they decide to disclose it before.

Next week there should be a new round of videos, maybe we will be able to hear something interesting from the other team members as well.