The top miner has 355mhs, they have more rejected mhs than I have total lol.
H2o, I'm not going to accuse you of anything, but I do know big miners that have said you take more than your fees state you take. If you don't mind, can you show some sort of proof of how much you are taking? Maybe your public address so we can see how much you are withdrawing for yourself (even though you could have more than one and we would never know). I would like to see more transparency in this pool. Idc what coin is being mined (as long as it's more profitable than mining LTC straight), but I would like to see the fees that are being taken.
Also as someone else stated before, what did you mean by a refund transaction?
Not to speak for h2o (I'd like to hear his thoughts on this) but this isn't quite that simple. There are a lot of steps to this process.
We (as miners) send hashpower to the server. We have no way to collectively see how many shares are valid blocks on the coin being mined, and we dont even know the coin being mined (even if h2o compiled and published data per share and per it would be extremely simple to fake).
Next, blocks go from the server wallets to exchanges. Again, this data could be published, but easily faked. We have no idea where h2o is trading coin (and I'm not sure I want to know), and what exchange rates are for the coins. Then, BTC are sent from exchanges (probably through middlecoin wallets) to users. The fee probably comes out here.
I'm all for transparency, and it would be nice to know a bit more about the inner workings here. However PROVING that the shares sent in should result in a certain amount of BTC out would be extraordinarily difficult, and would certainly expose everything about the process (which would consequently destroy much of the advantage middlecoin has over competitive pools).