But facts are facts, if she didn't possibly have a vagina, she would not have had the same amount of support from random internet people. And I assure you 100% things would not have gone on this long just because Vegetta whines? I know for a fact no one gives a shit about some guy starting a porn cam site whining to someone else online. But I bet if that person is a female and she is being attacked verbally, well, it is the manly thing to do, type about the subject until it's over, then create more and more threads about it (like your other one)
Swing and a miss: You're missing every point I've been trying to make completely.
My point was female or no, most of what I've read from her has been well rounded perspective from a business owner attempting to integrate Bitcoin. I personally would have supported the things she's said even if she weren't female.. and yes, the discussion (for me anyway) is about koolaid-drinkin' Bitcoiners who sit in their own political and economic circle-jerks and are cutting the throat of the very economy they're allegedly trying to build. So it most certainly would have gone on this long if the main detractor in that thread wasn't female.
Everyone being a yes-man to every hair-brained business idea is not constructive - constructive criticism is. Look in the exchange threads, there's people who are experienced traders on other markets asking why our markets don't do this this or this, and the response is something along the lines of "waagh why can't everything go my way". Fuck that shit - to me the greatest strengths of some of these exchanges is that an idea is put out there and they listen. That's constructive!
Everyone jacking off to the same Randian philosophies that
alienate much of the internet is not constructive to building an economy. When you say shit like "taxation is slavery" and "fuck off parasite" you alienate huge swaths of people who might really have something to bring to the economy and the
only people you attract in return are the "damn gubmint ain't takin muh riches" types who guess what:
through the very conditioning that led them to the situation they're in, are most likely more into precious metals than they would be Bitcoin anyway. Even if they do convert some of their holdings to BTC, all they do is give the economy value in the form of it's ability to exchange for fiat currencies - not for goods and services like everyone is hoping for. Show of hands everyone who gives a shit about fiat currencies in the long term? I didn't think so.
We've had a massive PR problem for ages now: we look like kooks. Most people don't make the connection that the value in most everything we consider valuable is actually perceived (read: imaginary) value - all they see is us trading "imaginary money" that we make out of thin air. To get over that perception issue the rest of our act has to be rational, to show people that hey... this just might work. This community appears anything but rational the vast majority of the time.
