As far as Im conserned every person in this thread is an idiot.
The moment you sent any mount of coins into a exchange, you give up those coins, they are no longer yours, the exchange can then instantly include them in another transaction.
This comes down to a person being attached over his coins, which are not unique.
So people sent in coins, and at the same time, it happened that stocks was sending out coins to someone who moved 20 000 coins to make a masternode, the wallet automatically took the more recent deposit due to its larger size, so it cost less on transfer fees and size, instead of 500 smaller deposits, or how ever the X coin wallet chooses what coins to send. And that is stocks exchange making a masternode?
You send coins into a exchange, you give up the coins for a promise that you will get those coins added into your account, the coins that you sent are not yours anymore.
When the exchange adds your coins into your account, it doesnt care about your "coins" on the blockchain, those coins can be spent, moved, etc.
Your balance will show your deposit, now if you want to take your coins out, the exchange will not return your original coins, it will take other coins it has in its wallet and make a new transfer. So your coins will be at the other persons masternode, and other coins replace your coins.
if you think this is stocks exchange making a masternode for themselfs, you are an idiot. Please open any cryptocurrency wallet, go into the settings and enable coin control features and get fimiliar with it, you will notice that different transactions have different priorities on use.
the 850 coins this person sent had a bigger priority than 200 other smaller transfers, and so, his coins where moved, and not the others that the exchange has.
Another example, I sent two (2) Zcash into poloniex, my poloniex wallet, on the blockchain still has those two coins, because poloniex has not had a need to move them anywhere so far. Ive sold my coins and traded them for something else, those coins i sent continue to sit in the poloniex wallet waiting for the time that they are needed.
You are all idiots, making fud out of thin air.
If these blockchain explorer screenshots can be used as proof that an exchange is making masternodes for themselfs, then you can go and make these claims for any exchange that trades in masternode coins, because at somepoint someone will have purchased the amount needed for a masternode and then he will move the coins out of the exchange to his masternode.
Funny that you call everyone an idiot then proceed with with various one sentence paragraphs that read like you were dropped on your head. So, let's go over why SE possibly taking coins to make a MN is pretty bad; Coins being taken and used to create masternodes, which in turn in case you didn't know generate more coins, speeds along the process of market inflation at no real cost to SE. They can in turn sell the coins for whatever price (and generally what ever buy is available) as it is then pure profit from that standpoint. Hell, they even get to double dip at that point due to fees paid by the buyer of said coins. Neat, right?
Though I can agree that more needs to be proven before these claims can be taken as the truth, but there have been several red flags against this site since the start of this year that I'd advise some caution in the least.
