Might be possible. But I would still assume they are using wallet 2.0 and it would limit which blocks are even allowed to make it the network. But the odd thing was other wallets accepted it and relayed it. They should have just ignored it and banned that one bad block.

I think you can safety double it at this point and not worry about hitting the cap. Would hit it around day 30.

Thanks lightspeedy and hi Randall.

The original development of the coin did not have long term value and use in mind. It was meant to be one and done.  Due to this things were major issues. Most notably starting with wallet lag and bad orphan rate.  This was due to among many things 20 second block time. For a global network of wallets that were accepting blocks, relaying transactions and creating PoS blocks, it was not a long term feasible setting.

Also the PoW structured allowed for pools and users with high hash power to basically take over the chain and potentially cause other issues.  To fix this I first made the first change to limit PoW by only allowing it to come after a PoS block, and eventually at block 6.0 million it will be turned off.

Then I made further enhancements to the wallet to allow for more efficient quicker staking. This has the unintended consequences of causing lager wallets the ability take over chain, because they could calculate stake so quickly.  This only increased the issue of wallet lag and orphans and eventually caused a network split.

So the answer was to slow the chain down.  The slow down of the chain triggered a higher PoS difficulty and in turn a lower stake rate.  This is what you are seeing now.  The benefits are much lower inflation rate, very little wallet lag, much lower orphan rate, and a network that works much better.

You know, if you get a stake reward, is highly based on fortune. The chance rises with the stake weight. or the mature time.

With less blocks created, for larger stakes it becomes advantageous to collect them into blocks of around 20k HBN.

@Tranz
My new organized stakes have reached an aging time of over 8.8 days, but nevertheless the message is "not staking because you don't have mature coins", and "Current Wallet PoS Weight: 0". I hope staking begins after day 10, otherwise we had a real problem.

It works smooth now, it's minting.

Since we now have a network that appears to be fairly stable. I am going to code up some of the user requests we have had over the days.

Here is what I have so far anything else I maybe missing?
 

• Fix Coin Control to only show weight after 8.8 days (Temporary until fork is coded and date set)
• Allow for larger split/combine threshold settings
• Allow for 100% stake for charity
• Fix the estimated time to stake in gui
• Code up stub function, but do not yet implement the stake modifier change. To get stake min at 1 day.

What else?


Seqwit is a huge undertaking. I would love to implement it. But unless I have a team of developer and testers, it is not going to happen anytime soon.

I want to focus my time for now, on bettering the wallet and network, continuing to re-base with newest bitcoin, creating a light weight and Android wallet that can stake, and adding other functionality.

• Allow for larger split/combine threshold settings

i can set split/combine manual ?

What else?
A block or age timer ? if blocknumber/age x then move 1 coin to adress y

I agree, the risk of going over max reward should be sufficient to prevent the creation of excessively large block sizes.  I would also like to have the set values persist through wallet restarts as it is a pain to have to repeatedly set these values whenever there is a need to restart the wallet.

How many times can I vote for this?

No unless it was fixed in last releases then it does not work from the conf.

Also I agree, I should be 100% user discretion.
Some of us enjoy trying for the 249.99 (adjust to your POS coin limits) at the minimum age by predicting future difficulty etc ...
part of the fun. reward vs time compound interest balance game.
clicking hundreds of blocks in coin control (cough bottlecaps) not so much! < included for contrast