I am participating in a bounty campaign through bountyhive. I like very much that they set a distribution date of the rewards, that's good because many campaigns take a long time with the final calculations.
I was participating in the DigitizeCoin campaign, which had a lot of support but did not reach the funds from the soft cap and at this moment they are refunding ETH to the investors.
The Bountyhive could be better, they should pay when a campaign does not distribute the rewards, because they pay less, they get rich and we are not paid if a campaign is not successful? It is a platform that tries to give security but in the end it does not.
You know for a fact that DigitizeCoin failed to reach their soft cap. So, whose fault was that? Bountyhive? You must be kidding me. Why would you expect or even think that bountyhive would pay you, us (I also part of that campaign) for a failed ICO? Do you think that they are the source of funds or the token to distribute to the hunters? and where do, Bountyhive get the token if DigitizeCoin itself doesn't want to cooperate? Yes, they do escrow but the tokens always come from the ICO not from their own pocket, for heaven's sake! I know a platform like bountyhive but so afraid to escrow and you should know the reason but Bountyhive has the guts to do it and to me that impressive. Bountyhive is just a portal, a new platform that offers innovation for bounty hunters like us. They make our tasks easier. I know that transparency is a big issue on their part but hey, they just new in their own developed-platform give them a time and I heard a lot of features will be put up on their platform to address the issue of transparency.