I myself often experience these obstacles when participating in a bounty but I still believe that projects that will experience success are many and we need to be patient in facing this problem with the cold to anticipate the occurrence of despair.

There must be some identification why a bounty platform is considered as scams. In this case, we cannot only determine the scam because there is no spreadsheet. It may be only lack of transparency. Here, we also can see that many bounty hunters have proven the credibility of bounty programs managed by Bountyhive. We may need to analyze more about this platform, especially from the web and telegram channel.

Its Quite unfortunate that projects that seems promising turn out this way, Im not sure but Bountyhive seems very legitimate to me, gues more investigation will be needed on my side.

No transparency on the part of bounty hive, I have stopped participating in their campaign .No spreadsheets for hunters to check. Too bad but we do not have a choice

How could you say that at your rank?
 I am same Jr as you.
I know I should not be harsh with you but I think you don't have enough right to say against bountyhive. If you don't like their service then I suggest better leave and don't spread fud.

Now have a lot of scam!! It make you positive.
But I think this not scam!
Their team is also active. Can you talk with them? and you will receive support.
And about they pay a little I think it's their rules. I don't complain with this.

HI I also had an issue with Bounty Hive. Details I described here:

https://steemit.com/ico/@annahare/bountyhive-versus-steemit-open-letter-to-the-community

https://steemit.com/ico/@annahare/bounty-hive-vs-steemit-part-2

And short excerpts from both articles:

" Dear BountyHive community. I guess all of you know well this quote:
‘NOTE: YOUR ENTRY STATUS IS 100% FINAL. Entries are double-checked by different members of our staff and we will NOT change the status of your entry after we've already verified it’.

This rule made by the BountyHive reminds me a beautiful Latin maxim “Lex retro non agit”, which translated to English sounds: „law isn't retroactive”. As you probably guess or know, this is a basic rule of Roman law which, by the way, is a base of modern national and international law. The problem arises when this rule is treated selectively." (...)

(...) "After I was banned I had a small chat with the Telegram administrator of the English bountyhive group. He sent me an example of 3 articles from Steemit that received stakes. And to be honest I was deeply disappointed. Two Russian articles were a piece of crap. First one contained plenty mistakes, the second one was a video transcription, made by a program. Seriously? What about the quality? Guys, I would be ashamed to reward it. The third article written this time in Turkish had bought upvotes. From 300 followers guys had 111 upvotes including the one made from a popular service for buying upvotes. This is was a proof of my thesis that NOBODY READS THE ARTICLES!" (...)

More yes than no. Only 5% of all projects that were presented on the platform of bounty high were eventually added to the exchange, or just developing. The rest send tokens, but in the end, they are worth nothing. Some of them don't pay at all. The opinion of this site is very ambiguous.

Until now I have worked with them. I'm thinking this, but seeing the ones written here I think I'll think a little. It does not seem right to take advantage of the work of the participants.

I am somewhat less fond of bounty hive. because indeed this portal bounty can not provide accurate data and too closed. data is not everyone they are holding but this could be an act of cheating