My "patch" didn't cause anything to your coin accept attempt to fix it for you -- it's never been used as far as I know outside of me testing it on my own system for all of 5 minutes to see the chain stabilize its height and properly keep the TX from the mempool. The test run lost out to the main-chain trust score nearly instantaneous and was a segregated chain -- you know by what the crypto world calls consensus which is how networks work -- not that I think you understand any of that.

Beyond that, how is it even possible my alleged fork could break your "working" code? If someone could so easily fork your damn chain then your chain doesn't work anyway. The simple fact is your code is shitty and it doesn't work right. Hell, it's damn easy to verify that my patch would simply cause a stable side fork based on height instead of trust alone -- nothing else. Your PoS trust logic controls the main chain. For what you keep lying about to even POSSIBLY be true, I'd somehow need have connections to all of the exchanges to have had anyone on the "fork."

Wow, just wow. You're either stupid or obtuse and I can't decide which -- probably just both.

At the very least, if you want to pretend to be peercoin, then you need to backport properly which you aren't doing. If your chain is forking and not back-porting TX properly, the "rewrite" and "resurrect" logic is terribly broken at the very least. Fix your shitty code or base your chain on height and keep your chain stable -- take your pick.

Either way, as I've said, don't blame me for it -- look in the mirror or to whoever you paid to write that pile of junk. If the exchanges pulled your coin it's because it's broken you dumb shit not because someone tried to help you.