Right click on the icon and select "open file location", try to recover the dat file at least.

It would suck if those are gone.

WHAT APP DOES THIS WALLET WANT ME TO INSTALL?

Why is this wallet so complicated and change everyday on my pc?
This is getting really frustrating.

Cant the so called Devs help with this?

When I click on run the Paccoin_installer.exe file it tells me to install an app and to get apps from the store.....

NOW I CAN BUY SOME MORE PAC AT A WAY CHEAPER PRICE FOR REDEMPTION!!!  

First you need to find out why the file disappears. I assume it is an anti-virus program is quarantining your paccoin-qt file.
You may have more than one on your sytstem, so check each one.
Usually you have a way to set exceptions so that your software will not keep quarantining your program.
Next if you are having trouble downloading from the mega site, which is what paccoin community uses, you could try downloading the wallet from www.paccoinofficial.com
if you still have problems feel free to contact us.

Why are there so many blocks at the same height on the paccoinexplorer?
http://paccoinexplorer.us:3001/

I don't know Bill, not very technical about this, what's your perception?

My guess is the blockexplorer is using the "patch" or if its not, its listing the blocks. What needs to happen is the consensus model should decide which block is correct.

Before under the old website there were duplicates, but not as bad. I assume the database is copying the information, and not deleting it later when the wallets reorganize. Normally this is rectified when the wallets walk back to the duplicate decide which one is correct, and then begin rebuilding the chain. Any transactions other than mined blocks are added to the blockchain so no transactions are lost. (except for mined blocks).

Breakcrypto said his patch does not leave duplicates in the blockchain, but it does prevent the rewind attacks as he calls it.

I want to beleive that his solution works, but I'm still in need of evidence. My experience with testing the patch was there was no reorganize.
This is crucial because in order to have only one correct blockchian wallets need to have consensus and therefore duplicate blocks are eliminated. Only one blockheight is allowed.

If his patch eliminated the orphans when mining then the only logical explanation is that his wallet is operating on a fork. an easy way to verify this is to look at the txid of the generated block and look on block explorer. If there are multiple blocks at that height, then its on a fork.

The reorganize is the correct response.

i'd like to add a correction.
I noticed that all three blocks on the explorer having the same number also had the same block hash number.
This was unexpected. I assumed they were different.
More inquiry should be made.

 for example

2645321   163c5b1271fc4213de509ea1a937d024e61765b727bc904e08de0f68a31a3244   2   20109.30825100   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:44:55 GMT
2645321   95fe5e11dff4c63ebf2ef51e2a1fc63e7323d59f00190383d4b708d1c2f0ec93   2   99999998.99990000   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:44:55 GMT
2645321   18417af4406dd79020763c90540a27452d0ebaa28cfdc2967316da73bdcfc704   1   3533731.17525600   Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:44:55 GMT

these appear to be different transactions with the same block height

However when you hover over the block height 2645321 it shows the same block hash of:

7b4f07b84a9673bde2a80f2078c8e52d1d89c72eabd5b0ea3e1b868080451c80

I believe what is happening is the different transactions are merging instead of being copied normally.

That is why there are multiple block numbers with the same block hash.

The implications are that they are not being disseminated to the network. Only the wallets with the merged transaction have them, the other wallets don't. This is worse than a fork.

All thanks to the New Devs providing the patch to help fix the wallets on the exchanges. Absolutely NO thanks goes to Mr. Corless, who didn't do a single thing.

The New Devs should close this thread, or at least send a request to change the link on coinmarketcap to the new one, whenever that appears.