busy professors don't usually respond to emails from people they don't know
they have published integration instructions
it is open source
LACK of action is not an action opposing, it is just a lack of action.

sounds reasonable.  Maybe this is the right path then; and possibly, if we get started on it FIRST, and show the profs that we are serious, that they may even be willing to help then.

API 2 won't care about addresses. Transactions will be signed on client side.

I have to agree. I imagine they must get a hell of a lot of mail -- starting work on an implementation of ZC and asking questions may be the signal they need for dialog to happen.

 <shrug>

In my search for a crypto algo reviewer, I was referred to a crypto expert named Matt Green.  He did get back to me yesterday and said he was currently advising Zerocoin but might have some time to review our code.  I did mention to him that we were interested in implementing Zerocoin with Nxt POS and would like him to review our code if he could.  Here is his blog, seems like a really nice guy; http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/

Also, I've had a hard time getting crypto people to review the code, they would rather review a protocol design document instead of code.

Oops, I forgot about that 10 BTC. Could anyone remind me address where they r stored on?

Old 64-bit unsigned number.

Ah, ok. Let's do it after we launch open beta test of Asset Exchange.

The file with the link to online wallet (blockchain.info guid) is encrypted with the BTC address...

I think guys who sold me the bitcoins should have it in their wallet history.

Edit: I'll find it in browser history, don't worry.