I will try to implement/use/test some scripts or tools to perform such tests during the weekend. I guess you are the "tulip"-guy on the testnet?
did you use a script to place these 100 orders?

2nd video from the 2014 Texas Bitcoin Conference:

http://prisonorfreedom.com/how-to-get-free-nextcoins-nxt-2014-texas-bitcoin-conference/

Enjoy
Tai Zen

This makes me think about the long term value of Nxt. I understand Nxt was always intended for businesses (Wall street guys in CfB speak) as a new platform. BCNext doesn't want "miners" involved and the few remaining will be shaken out when fees drop to ~0 but this will also make Nxt attractive to businesses (they may get 100-1000 transactions for the price of one).

I see the long term value of Nxt tokens being a function of:

i) Savings from transaction fees. Edit for clarity: They move from a normal 2-3% ish of now to Nxt 0.0001% per transaction.
ii) The risk businesses are willing to take to ensure the continuation of ther platform (i.e. buying stake and supporting the network). Consider these as Business Insurance Premiums.

I can't see Nxt tokens being worth close to zero under these conditions (cheap ones will be bought up by the most established businesses before it got close to zero), nor can I see them going "to da moon" as it would be a barrier to entry for new businesses.

Jl777, you seem to be the most advanced down the route of visualising and setting up businesses with high numbers of transactions. Any thoughts?
  

Yes
After some modification , i will share my test tool(window platform)

Sure this isn't just because it takes a lot longer to implement NXT?
Have they said "HAH FUCK YOU NXT!" ?

Ripple does have value, as without value it will be useless. Since there are  100 times less nxt, one nxt should be 100 times more valuable than one ripple (if all the ripples are distributed, which they are not).

I'll use the original thread by BCNext.

I was also thinking about the typical use cases for buying/selling stuff with NXT. The asset exchange as it is now implemented on the test network covers some of them, but not all.

Here are some use cases:

1. Selling an item that has a limited supply and that can be re-sold, for example stock for a company. This is what is implemented currently on the asset exchange on the test network. Seller wants to pay a listing fee and to spam the global namespace in the asset exchange.

2. Sale of digital goods. There is an unlimited supply. Items are not re-sold. Prices are typically low. Seller doesn't want to pay the listing fee on the asset exchange. This is what the previous message talked about. This would need a standardized message format, user interface and a place to store the files outside of the blockchain.

3. Mail-order. Seller sends stuff in the mail. Items are not re-sold. This would need a standardized message format, and a user interface.

In 2 and 3 there is also the question of whether the seller wants to declare the items to be sold on the blockchain. If he has a big list of items and low prices he can publish this information on a website to cut down the costs.

If there is more discussion I'll continue on the other thread.

Actually not quite true - the value is simply that they are scarce** and every time you transact you have to "burn them" (and your account needs to have x amount before you can transact).

** When you consider just how many XRP there are then the word "scarce" is not quite the same as NXT or BTC in particular.

Thus the only reason you should *want* XRP is if you want to use Ripple - but as pretty much no-one is using then currently the only reason anyone has been wanting XRP is to speculate (which is not its purpose - it is just an anti-spam device basically).

To be clear - BCNext wanted NXT to function similarly to XRP and therefore not to have any value of "speculation" other than what the market deems necessary in order for people to perform the transactions that they need.

Well, I am back from Texas Bitcoin Conference and it was an extremely interesting experience.

Marketing NXT at TBC was a frustrating experience.   Wed night late I went around and put the NXT brochure out on literally 1600 chairs in preparation for the next day.  At noon on Thurs I went around and picked up the unused ones.  We probably only had 100 or so that were kept.  Of course the conference only had around 600 people, far less than expected.  I have made arrangements to ship the rest out to NxtMinnow for San Francisco.  

The exhibitor area was kind of a joke.   Very few tables, very few people went through it.  I was wrong to push for a separate NXT table earlier, it would have been a waste.    

I was on the cryptocoin panel discussion which I think went very well.  The video will be out in a few days and I'll post a link.  There were maybe 30 guys in the audience and on a show of hands probably only 5 had even heard of NXT.

I made a lot of good contacts, including a writer for Bitcoin Magazine with whom I had a very long talk about NXT.  He is going to write an article on us.  This is probably the number one positive thing for NXT that has come out of the conference.

The interest in Etherium in the Bitcoin community is extremely strong.  This is a trend to watch.

People want to hear confident leaders on a stage.  People want to hear confident leaders  on a stage.  People want to hear confident leaders  on a stage. 

The thing that has surprised me most, the biggest insight of all, is how few people care about the technical side of Bitcoin.  Over 95% of the people there view Bitcoin as a social/political phenomenon and wouldn't care if it were powered under the hood by three witches cackling around cauldron of witches' brew.  Talking about the advantages of transparent forging over competitive mining or PoW vs. PoS or trusted gateways or pretty much anything we discuss in this forum is totally irrelevant to them and actually to the future of NXT.

We will only get the attention of the mass community of Bitcoiners if we come up with a marketing theme campaign that engages people to adopt NXT.  The will not adopt NXT because it is better or technically superior.  They will only adopt NXT if it meets a need of theirs that Bitcoin does not already currently meet.  

This is why Doge is so popular and is even surpassing Bitcoin in many ways.  Doge meets a social need to feel connected to something warm and fuzzy that Bitcoin does not.

I am at a loss to figure out how NXT can pull off a similar viral meme feat.  But we need to figure that out, fast.

Thanks RickyJames.

You are right about making NXT popular. We need to brand ourselves.
I will post some techniques how Retail markets are branding their brands like Gstar, Prada etc.

Maybe it can inspire us.

I heard Damelon is also busy to brand NXT.