Bitcoin is a decentralized virtual online currency because maximum countries it is not controlled by governments and banks but centralized currencies is controlled by banks, government.

I much prefer being decentralized because no one can control or manipulate it even the governments. Once it was being centralized they have the power to control it whenever they wan. In fact it is more safe for me being decentralized than centralized because not all people in the government are trusted.

I prefer if bitcoin is made in a centralized system. with the centralized system the bitcoin will be more manageable. bitcoin prices will be more stable. crime through bitcoin can also be handled well because crime can be more easily controlled. I am sure if bitcoin is set then bitcoin can be more widely accepted by society. no more price manipulation and crime involving bitcoin. That's a bit of my idea

Wll, it is better for the bitcoin users if it will become centralize because that was one factor that we can say bitcoin will last forever. There are other countries who want it to use as their regular money as payment in some stores if it is become centralize then many people will attract to invest  or buy bitcoin.

That's maybe true but when it becomes centralized the government will have the right to manipulate it like they are doing with fiat for the longest of the time.

You got it all wrong. Bitcoin is not centralized, its opposite. It would be best if you do some research before making posts like this.
Here is the link where you can find basic understanding what blockchain is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain

Bitcoin i think would rather be decentralized because its activities particularly those regarding planning and decision-making,
are distributed or delegated away from a central, authoritative location or group.Therefore, one is empowered to make their own decisions, giving them a sense of importance and making them feel
as if they have more input in the direction of the organization. When centralized, organizational structures focus management authority
and decision-making in a single executive team, with information flowing from top managers to various units.

Bitcoin is much more considered as a decentralized type of cryptocurreny that undoubtley have the freedom to its system when it comes to transactions and trading. It is prefer to be an cryptocurrency that has no anyone who can control its system in terms of transaction that is supported by the blockchain. But people should focus on the greater things bitcoin could give to us like opportunities and chance that we could used to build an investment that could be a source of our earning in the future.

Agree. Both decentralized and centralized systems have their advantages and disadvantages one from another. However, I believe that decentralized systems will always prevail over centralized ones, simply because they're secure and resilient against attacks from third parties. Bitcoin being a decentralized cryptocurrency has such benefits, and it explains why it's been a successful medium of exchange after all these years. Turning itself into a centralized system would not be such a good idea, since it can be easily manipulated by third parties.

Unfortunately, that's case with Ripple, since it's a "cryptocurrency" that's maintained and controlled by its internal company. The most share of XRP tokens are owned by the Ripple company itself, putting at risk the long-term viability of such centralized system. Therefore, if Bitcoin maintains a decentralized cryptocurrency, then it will continue to rise both in demand and value over time. However, if all the contrary happens, then Bitcoin will be doomed as well as most cryptocurrencies in existence to date (since they're dependent on Bitcoin's progress as a reserve currency). Just my thoughts