As well as the great advantage of decentralization, it is a great opportunity for the lower strata of the population to earn and grow richer. In a centralized system, there is practically no such possibility.

I agree.Bitcoin in the first place is decentalized in nature and i don't think it will be centralized in the future.If people want a centralized one,then there's no need to use bitcoin because we have our fiat currency that is already centralized.And yes it's the decentralization of bitcoin that will mostly attract new investors and the fact that bitcoin is also a volatile one.

Nobody can change the decentralized nature of bitcoin and it is important to understand that it is the feature that has drawn millions of users to it all over the world. For me, I enjoy the fact that I don't have to pass through any centralized body before my transaction is completed. Exchanges can be centralized for some reasons.

Exactly. There's a wide variety of centralized choices in this world which are regulatory compliant and don't have scalability issues. However, I believe that decentralized payment systems like Bitcoin are the way to go for many obvious reasons. The level of freedom, and accessibility, allows Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to grow at a faster rate in terms of usage and popularity. Since no single entity can control a decentralized cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, people can rest assured that their funds are safe against freezing or confiscation from third parties.

Centralized systems like PayPal, Ripple, Visa, and Mastercard, are extremely vulnerable to freezing of funds, confiscation, single points of failure, and more. Therefore, Bitcoin would be best to stay as a decentralized cryptocurrency for years to come even if it must sacrifice its efficiency in the mainstream world, to maintain its true value proposition. Being decentralized, means that it's extremely resistant to external manipulation, attacks, and more. Just my thoughts

What is broad set of charges, i did not understand the depletion feature you are talking about bitcoin. The price of bitcoin cannot the controlled by some individual, yes there are earlier investors who holds a large amount of coins, unless they plan to sell off the coins nothing is going to happen.

Decentralized or centralized beckkoin. Both have a number of advantages and disadvantages. One thing is clear: if it is decentralized, it will be poorly accepted by the states, and its high volatility will not allow us to use bitcoin as the main currency, as well as currency in international settlements. In addition, the high volatility of bitcoin will hamper the achievement of its high cost. With the high volatility of bitcoin, a panic among investors will arise earlier than it can reach high costs. Therefore, the decentralized nature of bitcoin will prevent the achievement by bitcoin of those qualities that we would like to see in it.

every second there is always someone trying to hack and steal bitcoin, it is certainly a very risky if bitcoin security level is not enough, one of the systems that make safe bitcoin is a decentralized system where every bitcoin financial transaction is recorded and needs to be confirmed on each block before reaching the intended wallet, I would agree more with this system

It's better off for Bitcoin to remain as a decentralized cryptocurrency for many obvious reasons. First, people would want to use money that they could always control. Second, they would want to preserve their wealth for a long time without ever having to worry about governments or any other third party freezing their assets. The opposite side of this, is centralization where Bitcoin could be exposed to external attacks, and easy manipulation from a single entity.

While there's a tradeoff between decentralization and efficiency, I often prefer Bitcoin to stay decentralized even if it doesn't manage to handle a large amount of transactions per second. Therefore, I hope that it could stay as is for quite a long time.

may be better decentralized because in each country has its own authority over their finances if centrally there will regulate the State's finances over other countries, perhaps with the existing system well only I think the existence of bitcoin amid advances in good technology in facilitation so no news negative about the presence of bitcoin and bitcoin can also stimulate the economy with the help of investors.

Agree. Bitcoin should stay decentralized as is for years to come. There's no reason to make it a centralized currency, as doing so will destroy Bitcoin and the blockchain's true value proposition. Being decentralized, means freedom, resistant against external attacks, and immutable record of transactions. But, a centralized permissioned cryptocurrency or blockchain will suffer from many disadvantages such as single points of failure, limited access, and confiscation of funds.

In the end, Bitcoin and most cryptocurrencies will do better as decentralized systems since they're open for anyone to audit, join them, or secure them without restrictions or limitations whatsoever. Just my thoughts