Can anyone answer this? I use the modified BFGminer for all my rigs. I've got one computer with an average cpu (Athlon II X4 640, quad core) mining MED with a 7.5 GH/s jally which takes about 50% of the cpu power. It shows ~6.4 GH/s work upload rate on the BFG screen, and 7.5-9.5 GH/s reported speed on the Ibipot pool side, which is good. I also have 20 block erupter USB sticks. If I put those 20 on the same rig (without the jally) the cpu usage hits 100% about half of the time, bfgminer will report a work upload rate of about 200 MH/s per stick and the Ibipot pool reports about the same speed per stick. The problem improves when I put the sticks on a rig with an 8 core FX-8350, the cpu usage never maxes out, but it goes pretty high and bfgminer reports a work upload of 260 MH/s per stick. Better, but still pretty poor.

My question is why would 20 usb sticks which only amount to 6.6 GH/s take more CPU power than a jally (7.5 GH/s)? Also, would switching to cgminer significantly improve my usb stick hash rate, and reduce CPU usage? 25 MED reward for a good answer

I've been battling with the same low output issues since I started mining from the coin launch. Solo or Pool, bfg or cgminer, the "coins per day" stays about the same. I have 6 Antminer U1s that are modded to 1.2v (3Gh/s) and they run consistantly at 1 - 1.3Gh/s. It doesn't matter if I run 1 or 6, the output is the same(based on the CPU used). With an i3 CPU I can run 4 modded AMUs and the CPU usage is about 85-90%, with an i7 CPU, I can run all 6 with an avg. 75% CPU usage. Bfgminer has a higher overall Hashrate but lots more HW errors (38-40%), Cgminer has a lower overall Hashrate but almost no HW errors. The effective hashing rate remains about the same as far as I can tell. The biggest difference between bfgminer and cgminer seems to be in the Pool hashrate. Bfgminer shows my hashrate to be 4.5Gh/s with 4 AMUs, the pool worker hashrate is almost always 1.5 - 1.75 Gh/s lower, Cgminer registers a much lower hashrate on the pool (50-60% lower) than in cgminer itself. Solo mining cgminer seems to hash a little faster.

I don't really have a problem with the lower hashrate because it's in keeping with the premise of the coin by restricting the hashing power of the huge miners out there. I just can't nail the consistency down in the relationship between CPU and Hashing power. It looks like an i3 Processor will handle about 5 Gh/s before the CPU is maxed out (using Antminer U1s), and 8Gh/s with an i7. These numbers are based on my observations using my Laptops, others may get totally different figures..I don't know... What bugs me is if I am able to mine with a max hashrate of 4 to 5 Gh/s with an i3 Processor, why can't I do it with only 2 AMUs? My modded AMUs will mine a consistant 2.9-3.1 Gh/s each on a SHA256 coin. Theoretically...I should be able to max out an i3 Processor with 2 AMUs (instead of 5) and an i7 with 3 AMUs.

Like I said, I'm not really Bitching about the mining, but it would be nice to know if the hashrate is somehow limited "Per Device" in conjunction with the CPU or purely by a hashrate to CPU factor. It would save me what little Hair I have left trying to find the "Best" setup with bfgminer and cgminer...      

I find that if your'e using Antminer U1s, bfgminer is a little better.

need help bought a new antminer but its giving me only 0.64ghs and 40% of errors 
how can i make it run well and give the full hash power?

please anyone with antminers help

Wow the difficulty is 90k and my miner window is showing a new block 4 times a minute! Where's all the power coming from?

Dev team's pictures in Barcelona for GSMA Mobile World Congress are most promo materials, and tell us what the MED does different than other alt-coin, what is MED's advantage....

We need to more and more people know MED.

diff nearly 100k now. crazy

Network Weekly Stats:


 

Sorry for my english Mill  I did not mean to be rude.....
NETWORK HASHRATE ... is directly extracted from MED WALLET DAEMON... so the data it's true...