Should be fixed this with the following code for bitcore.


https://github.com/digibyte/bitcore/commit/402a73b5572e953010080ed5c1a9dd81c7815b3c

Cheers.

Of course.  I made them as a foundation.  Anyone can feel free to use them.  Or, if you want to adapt them, change them, etc., etc..

Why not?  I think it's still far too early in the adoption of digital currencies to guess about where they will or won't be in 5 or 10 years.  But, it's entirely possible that DGB could reach $1 per coin.  It helps to put things into perspective, I live in the State of California.  Last year, the GDP for California was nearly 3 trillion USD.  If all the 21 billion DGB existed today, (which they don't), and if the value of DGB climbed to $1 per coin, the market cap for DGB would still only be 0.7% of the GDP of California.

If you add up all the current market caps of all digital currencies you'll get something near $4 billion.  Last year, there was also something like $600 million in woldwide venture capital invested in BTC and other digital currencies.  So, let's just round up to another billion, and add that to the total current market caps.  That means that there is probably somewhere around $5 billion USD invested - total - in all digital currencies and companies.  Even if you add a couple of extra billion for miscellaneous costs and investments that are not accounted for in market caps and venture capital, we can still pretty easily estimate that the total money in digital currencies today is less than $10 billion.  So, just to put that number in perspective ... all the combined money in digital currencies is around 0.3% of the GDP of just California last year.  Apple Computers made about almost $15.9 billion dollars between October to December last year (3 times all the money in digital currency).  Goldman Sachs earned about $2 billion in the fourth quarter 2014 (so in 3 months that single investment firm made 50% as much money as all the money in digital currencies).

There's no reason to go on and on with examples.  The plain and simple truth is that digital currencies are still in the very preliminary stages of adoption and, at present, they are incidental to overall economic activity.  DGB has enormous room for growth, it is part of a great new technology.

Great coin you have here!, i am mostly a Guldencoin user an enthusiast but since i heard on our forums about the development and community behind this coin i decided to buy myself some Digibyte. I am also using the new miner from a few posts above, i haven't received any coins yet from the mining unfortunately. The only thing i am a bit confused about is which are CPU/GPU algo's, i think it is better to put something like Skein(CPU)..., it makes it easier for the new user to understand which Algorithm to use. I know that you can mine with every algo on a laptop, but if somebody starts mining SHA-256 on an laptop it will take ages to get some coins instead of using one of the CPU algo's.

Welcome buddy! Good to see you over here!

Reading this thread in its entirety is quite daunting, I must admit that I am looking forward to reading your book. How many pages do you think it will have? 

I just tried Digihash 2 miner.
I am a bit disappointed.

Let's start with a minor thing: it reads v2 but on start, version number is 1.0.1.25068. Confusing. I had to reinstall... but apparently this is correct. Maybe that was just me.

I run using the "default" settings on a Radeon 7750 with driver 14.12 Omega. I'm not quite sure who figured out those settings to target which users.

For groestl, it uses -I 17 -g 2 -w 264 on my system. Worksize 264 (256+8) is sure a sub-optimal setting for my hardware (it should be a multiple of 64). Produces a lot, a lot of output. I had difficulties figuring out what was going on.

With qubit the settings are way more sensible (-I 16 -g 2 -w 256) but it makes my system fairly sluggish but can do.

Skein goes very wrong. Leaving aside it loads both my CPU (one core) and GPU and it goes with the w 264 nonsense, the main problem is it makes my system basically unusable. When I say "unusable" I don't mean it's hard to watch an HD video on youtube. I mean it's hardly possible to edit a text file in notepad. It could be a driver issue but just to be clear, I'm not going to mine Skein ever again.

The skein miner does a thing right however: the amount of output is sensible.

Is there a "how much performance do you want to use" slider?

The "wants higher performance possible" idea is a "core miner" mindset thing. Casual users will most likely want to mine while using their computers. You should really ask them how much power they need for their job and try to not interfere with their objectives.

Last note: Groestl and Skein use an animated icon when mining. I find it very distracting. Please reconsider this choice.

I have just designed a simple DigiByte book cover:

Had the chance to research this further, and, more importantly, to do some testing.

Re: What Does "Transaction Too Large" Mean?

We wanted to give everyone an update on the tipbot. We are in the process of making several upgrades to the back end and it will be offline for a few hours.