Find a less shitty contractor then?
Manage your budget. Or we'll do it for you. It's that simple. This is bad budgeting any way you slice it.
The REAL world still runs on USD, stop forgetting that please. This is not the year 2230 where crypto might or might not have worked out, this is the age of USD. Which in some sense of the word is "stable".
1.So if someone accepts Dash it's a shitty contractor? Wtf? If the idea is to "try" to make more adoption?
2. USD is not stable. Check the history of BirCanada who bought wine in US$ and his CA$ went down.
Why there is insurance for $ volatility in big contracts?
And the problem we have already exist for contracts between country, and like I said big company buy a insurance against volatility for that.
If someone accept Dash for his budget (for me it's the ideal deal), then the blockchain will pay him the fixed Dash amount every month.
In the case the price really go UP, really high, then can I remember that you can DOWNVOTE at any time, and maybe the person can re-submit a new proposal with less Dash/month?
The "shitty" part comes in when they don't give us an option. Not because they accept Dash. They are shitty because our core team has to defend them instead of thier work defending them. This wouldn't be an issue if we had more transparency into whats happening as far as "pr" work goes.
I agree everything is volatile, so when we have a chance to use a LESS VOLATILE CURRENCY TO BALANCE THE BUDGET, that should be a no brainer right? Couple that with my "don't put a network on the hook for a long term contract" point and what does that equal?
A fair budget that everyone can use, not just the PR firm, Core team & some top secret getaways.
We want grassroots PROJECTS, stuff we can watch grow, stuff we can see an ROI with.
I agree about the need for increased transparency and avoidance of long-term contracts. However, I do disagree about paying out USD as a default currency. I think if people want to do work for a currency, they should be willing to accept that currency. I think converting to fiat for a contractor should only be done in rare cases.
If there is a project you disagree with, make sure you vote NO. That's your duty as a masternode owner.
If the price of dash skyrockets and you think something you previously voted "yes" for is now overfunded, change your vote. As mentioned above, the proposal owner can always resubmit with a lower number.
We can pay for work in dash, and use the voting system to help level out volatility in price. That combined with short-term agreements (non-recurring, single payments)
We will probably all never agree on how this should be done, but it doesn't really matter if we agree. We can vote.
