While I agree people shouldn't be blindly voting YES to proposals just because they are proposed by someone they trust, that is also part of decentralized governance. Masternode holders get to vote for whatever they want, for whatever reason they want. Even if that reason is stupid.
Basically, we can't control the way people vote. What we can do, is campaign for masternode owners to set a higher bar for voting YES then just a trusted individual.
I have not voted yet, and I'm sure many others haven't as I expect more information to be given, so the YES to NO ratio is probably very off right now. If it gets closer to time and still no information, I will vote NO, and I assume many others will as well (or change their vote)