Nice to see my comment on this dashnews article today getting removed as spam, this forces me to make that comment here instead of in the
comments section of the article and make me think twice before commenting there again..

There is a difference in numbers statistics between the network report of masternode.me
(5008 total masternodes of which 4903 are enabled) and the masternode count graph of crowning
Link : http://178.254.23.111/~pub/masternode_count.png (4903 active masternodes).

Edit : i originally thought there was also a difference in numbers between masternode.me enabled masternodes and active masternodes on
the masternode count graph, but it turns out i forgot to click on "latest" with the masternode.me network report so i was seeing older data.

I'm not sure its wise to celebrate those 5000 total masternodes at the time of writing that article, when 128 of those were not even enabled.
I rather celebrate 5000 active masternodes on the masternode count graph (which will then also include a new ATH), even if that means
waiting a bit longer before making an article.

I understand those 5000 masternodes form a nice round number, but using two different set of statistics (total versus activeenabled) could confuse readers.