yeah, not one of these mnodes motherfuckers have the guts anymore to write here their bullshit?  of course not, more and more people are aware of their bullshit now. or maybe they all got Covid 19....divine justice!

yeah right, sure, fuck off!

$100 level firming up.

Dash not capable of drilling below the $100 level anymore.

Good good good !   ... you no longer come with your fantastic arguments, because lies no longer work and they fall too easy ... do you think that just by insulting you are going to deceive some new fool?   Well, you are wrong: Your corrupt modus operandi is exposed and, well, everything is clearer for those who need to decide about his capital. It's the least that can be done, right?

By the way ... which "better investment decisions" do you mean? Do you know the investments of the person you quote? ... because you tried to shut me up with that same troll gossip, as if you knew me ... and you had to stick your tongue in your ass, because I already made it clear to you - actually, it's easy, because now, your tricks are too obvious and shameless -: 2/3 of my position in DASH to Cardano and LINK at the beginning of the year ... and I get almost 500% from them today. By the way ... today I get back that position, with DASH still below its price then. The penalty is your shenanigans ... and that being a centralized and corrupt project cannot trust even the slightest bit and increase positions.

Because initial approach - that you have corrupted - was my favorite project ... you know? Now it's shit worth no more than the size of your next whim. NOBODY can ensure value in DASH, because all the wealth dumped will be at the expense of the next scam of those who hijack the project. (and I remember the "modest" Mnodes who believed that the marginalized were others and those who decided were themselves ... that 80% of the vote in DASH is not yet expressed, and that the whales of DASH have only just started voting ... and that their power of absolute abuse only becomes evident when the greedy Mnodes who have corrupted this system with their marginalization measures do not act as the REAL OWNERS of DASH they want ... but the "hundreds of votes with a click" have already begun to appear on DASH ... and that's just the beginning of the "joke").

The DASH code is no longer law: when any law can be voted for 200 corrupt and flipped in ANY sense, any existing law is just a perfectly dispensable anecdote, since only decentralization guarantees the rules of the game. This should be clear to anyone ... both those inside and those considering entering. Look how simple: In three months, DCG votes a proposal to require 10,000 tokens to configure a Mnode and collect rewards ... and the "modest" Mnodes are left as naked as the microholders or miners ... or they vote for a stable coin running on the DASH system so that those who have tokens see them fall to hell if they don't sell ... with a CENTRALIZED project, the traps can be THOUSANDS, anything can be voted on, ANYONE ... and 100 people who own Mnodes with two or four devices each one they are absolutely vulnerable and ridiculous to the groups that centralize possessions in DASH ... they can only stare and attend the show run by others. It turns out that those stupid arrogants who said a couple of years ago: "Do you want rewards or an opinion in DASH? ... Buy five mNodes!" ...now they can hear the same approach ... but with two hundred Mnodes. It sure looks like a lot of fun to them now!

Now, with those perspectives ... go find the "rich" you need ... so that you can steal their wealth given to DASH with your eyes closed , go, scammer, go...  

By the way ... more and more members, including Mnodes at this point in the movie , are suffering your traps and crap and see how they de facto marginalize them from any real management or decision right ... I leave you a link to a post from DeepBlue, Mnode especially active, totally flawless in its forms, and integrated into the group dynamics for years ... it is only a few days ago, of this last week ... and its arguments will be "known" to you and anyone who visits this thread ... you will surely love them    :

>>>>>

DeepBlue  3 points,6 days ago

" @geert the wisdom of crowds is exactly what I'm advocating. However there is no wisdom of crowds if DCG vote with their several hundred masternodes votes right at the beginning of their proposals because of fake social proof. We had 400+ votes that all appeared in one go right at the beginning of this proposal. That is the very opposite of wisdom of crowds when a very small group of people voting with large numbers of Masternodes. This is manipulation of the votes through using Social Proof principal that I spoke about.

Your own argument therefore nullifies itself. The wisdom of crowds only occurs when the actual crowd is not influenced by the FAKE social proof that DCG is creating by using their own MN votes on their own proposals.

I can't help but think where did the money come from for those hundreds of DCG masternodes? The more money DCG make the more individual MNOs will lose decentralized control of the treasury because the more masternodes the more voting power they will have. Bearing in mind that under most circumstances we only have about 600 to 800 MNO votes on a project and 400+ votes seem to be coming from a very small group of people who all vote at the same time for DCG projects.



Dash is systematically becoming centralised step by step. We have to stop this. These are the reasons why Dash is becoming centralized:

1. DCG vote for their own proposals with a large number of masternodes.

2. Ryan often will not answer questions about spending in the DCG proposals e.g. the DCG office space which has been shown to be completely empty on every time a trusted member of DASH has undertake spot checks on their office. Not once was any of DCG staff in that office at ASU complex. 55k for office space that is mostly empty. Ryan has not responded to my requests for feedback on this. Doesn't exactly garner trust Ryan when you remain silent. Doesn't look good at all on you Ryan and honestly it reduces my trust and confidence in Ryan Taylor by the lack of response.

3. Ryan Taylor has said several times he wants MNOs to "trust" e.g. he stated that we should trust the DIF and put forward his suggestions to the network that the MNOs do not need to approve their funding through a vote. We must be able to vote on funding from the DIF and we need to see the full financial investment agreement to do that. The DIF, which now also includes Ryan Taylor, does not want to agree to full transparency on the NDA. My view is if an organization wants an NDA on the financial agreement they are not right for being funded by a decentralized organization because we need to have transparency in the agreements and we need to see the full terms of those agreements.

4. The Dash Trust Protectors meetings are kept private. We don't know what goes on in those meetings. Why not?

5. DCG put Dash code into closed source for over a year and during that time did not answer my requests for information in their funding proposals which I repeatedly asked. We all now know why that was now. It was not to give Dash first mover advantage - it was because the code was not developed as it was supposed to be.

5. Ryan Taylor comes from a background of traditional finance. I'm sorry, but I inherently have a healthy level of skepticism from anyone coming from the traditional financial system and entering the Dash project. Ryan reached out to Evan Duffield and not the other way around.

6. I have spoken with DashWatch members in depth about circumstances regarding Alt36 and DCG claims on that project. I am not going to reveal all the details that I learned here because I don't think it is appropriate however I was disturbed by what I learned from speaking with DashWatch.

7. DCG do not want DashWatch reports on their project. I've spoken with DashWatch about this personally. There are excuses like it would take too much time or money or we have to trust them on their quarterly reports. Every other Dash project is subject to a DW report as an independent audit but DCG will not agree to do it.

8. Ryan is now also working on the DIF as well as on DCG CEO. I would not mind this so much provided we have full transparency on the actual financial agreement for funding - however we don't have this. My view is funding from a decentralized organization needs to be 100% transparent when it comes to the terms of the agreement. NDA's can be used for IP knowledge but not on the financial investment agreement.

9. If DCG are to continue to vote on their own proposal we should at least know how many MNs are they voting with exactly so that we can make a more informed decision how fake social proof is acting on these proposals.

Stage by stage, bit by bit we are losing decentralized control to DCG through Ryan Taylor's leadership. If this continues and the number of Masternodes that DCG holds increases we will lose decentralized control of the Dash Project. This is also likely to happen if this proposal passes because DCG will have access to even greater amounts of funds.

How would I feel OK with the budget increasing to 20? The following would have to happen as a minimum:

a) DCG agree to have quarterly DashWatch reports on their project.
b) We have procedures in place for MNOs to have the information they need in order to make quality decisions on projects. I have suggested a few ways this can be done on the Dash Forum.
c) The DIF have fully transparent investment agreements to the network. No NDAs obscuring financial agreements with the network. NDAs can be used on protecting knowledge on IP only but not on the financial agreement itself.

d) Spending by DCG is in question as far as I am concerned until the DCG is systematically independently audited both financially and on their project by DashWatch. In the past DCG wanted to spend 1 million dollars on google Ads. This shows that as the budget increase the spends increase and often without proper thought about how those funds are to be spent. 1 million dollars on google ads was absolutely crazy. Luckily circumstances changed so they could not spend this.

The $200,000 - $250,000 dollars per month going to DCG is more than enough. They have to learn to use this money more wisely. This is more than most other crypto projects are getting and even with this we still have not delivered Evolution on time.

I feel MNOs need to fight to ensure that the Dash project remains decentralized and that we do not have to rely on trust at all ".

I suppose that at any time ... although I will return what is essential to regain positions and go Free ride. Anything else is reckless and overconfident.

The issue is whether RTaylor & friends will empty it again and knock it down or will they let it go at once (although it does not represent a guarantee of anything in the medium and long term and it will only be a new stage until the next embezzlement). Anyway ... they install it in a range, stealing all the capital that comes in ... and then they leave tweeting: Hey! ... We are the most stable currency in the ranking !!!

It's pathetic. The worst thing is that in the current situation, DASH can never be considered as a decentralized and long-term crypto investment project. Any position is smoke in the air ... at the expense of whatever scam they come up with. They can be authorized by ALL.


For my part ... I continue as usual calling for a dev to fix that problem with a fork. It can be perfectly minimized (and still linked to the central project ... but evolving in parallel with a worthy approach)

I hope you get REKT and can no longer afford internet so we don't have to suffer through your incomprehensible rants you moronic lunatic.

Many would have agreed with you, but they mostly ended up here.



Be my guest.

You're off to a great start