(XC implementation of mixer)
Meaning(my guess)

1) a type of mixer server is used which is implemented to client.
2) user send money to mixer with encrypted real payee adress.
3) money is spllited to 2 ~ many small amount, so many tx created. (or ... )
3) mixer takes user money(all tx), and send to real payee.
 

Money paid to mixer.

Fedoracoin already implemented mixer.


What will be multipath(my guess) ?
As many tx created, each tx will use another mixer. or just one mixer, transmission path is altered ?


What about fee (my guess) ?
Minimum mixer fee will be splitted to each tx.


Edit:

As XC dev mentioned it, Current version is, trust me, if you send your money to me, i will send your money to your payee, trust 3rd party implementation.

XNodes will charge a fee which will be deducted from the transaction and kept in the local wallet << incentive based >>

Yet another affirmation that DRK, with its HUGE first mover anon advantage, is assuming its rightful place at the top of the list!

After a rough start, some very positive things coming out of Darkworld this week:

• Bitfinex (not yet confirmed)
• masternode fix incoming
• Amir Taaki of Darkwallet reveals himself as a DRK supporter
• Max Keiser joins the DRK side
• Cryptsy adds DRK/USD
• Continued media attention

The recent masternode fork issue will soon look like a mere hiccup and be remembered as nothing more than a great buying opportunity.

Cryptsy added DRK/USD Storm is coming : ) ) ) next new price 30 $

Official response from Bitfinex here, at the end:

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/26uhkp/warning_bitfinex_is_bugged/chusmc1

Wow! This is great, and here i was thinking Cryptsy didn't do any fiat at all.

Reading back over the original post about the voting system, the only reason I can come up with for requiring multiple votes is that multiple addresses can be nominated per block.  Theoretically each address could have 1 vote and nobody would get paid.  Why is 6 the magic number though?  No idea.

The path to .03
For those who believe in TA and think that it applies to the world of Crypto trading, charts are lined up nicely for a move to .03
Cup and handle formation showing a possible measured move to .029
Resistance around .025 and previous ath of .0277
Fundamentals and news flow support a move higher
Recent washout shook out the weak hands

Things are lined up nicely at the moment for DRK.

it's just an idea only.
can all valid MNs be paid for every found block?
Tx will go through random one but all MN will get paid in the same way.
Ex: 5 coins 400MN = 0.0125 drk for every MN which is in service
Thnx that its fair enough don't you think?

Maybe, but it would probably require a lot of changes to the protocol. Remember, Bitcoin is set up to pay the full block reward to just one node. Judging by the time it has taken to code up and test MN payments -- getting that reward fairly spilt over 2 nodes is a challenge. Now trying to further split that over hundreds of nodes... may be more trouble than it is worth.

Evan seems to have the problem with the current method sniffed out, anyway. I am not sure if going back to the drawing board is necessary at this stage.