I think Kristov's review will be key. That provides the rubber stamp.
I sympathize for his job, as he is not reviewing static code but rather something that is constantly changing evolving reprogrammed to new functionality. You can't really rubber stamp if you have to face this (otherwise positive) problem.
This has been my only long-standing concern for DRK; are even the crypto-people too stupid to see what it can do?
Crypto-traders, buyers, etc do not usually understand technical concepts, not necessarily because they are stupid, but because they might lack the knowledge to properly evaluate stuff.
1. We've seen that in "complex" coins:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/637645 (read post #2 and post #9 by me)
2. We've seen that in the anonymous market: a lot of people were unable to properly evaluate the worthiness of certain coins in the marketplace. People were getting excited by vapor, believing FUD as truth, claiming scummy P&Ds are innovative anonymous coins, equating DRK being trustless and decentralized with other trusted and centralized solutions, not understanding the difference between actual coins that can be used versus proof-of-concept coins etc etc.