Nope. This is for mainnet. Only those who want to run a liquidity provider need to run it though.

What is the difference, either conceptually or practically, between a side chain and a separate currency? And pegging two chains price-wise is equally pointless because then it basically *is* one currency.

It seems the BTC crowd want to experiment with innovation without 'harming' their sacred cow, but they can't have it both ways - you throw your ideas to the wolves and if it survives the wolves you have a winner. Tying the wolves up and slapping muzzles on them first doesn't help the evolution of your idea, it hinders it and you learn nothing of value from the experiment.

Plus, it will take years for any of this to happen anyway, if it ever does.

Cool coinz! thnx for that, I`ll run some coins too not always but from time to time...

such horrlble, wow.

Of course you do. Not your own money though, eh?

The fact that he pretends to take Dark Wallet seriously is actually pretty good news. (I say pretends to because this whole thing is just another circus act to raise taxes. That's how government works.) By the time they have wasted countless millions of taxpayer money trying to police Bitcoin, and failed, Darkcoin will be well and truly established, having been helped along in its adoption by this clown and his thieving comrades.  

I hope he doesn't take it too seriously. Just having a little fun. He's actually one of my favorite people here.

Just finished informing ALL pools about the 10.15.16 update on mail twitter irc etc...
cheers darkcoiners up up to the start...

LOOOOL