Well, as I logged in on my computer, I wasn't signed in to BTC so I saw Mrpumperitis's comment (not realizing I normally have him on ignore)  And I read that he is worried that there will be no organization to pay fines if DASH were fined like Ripple, et al were. 

I just wanted to say, all currencies and exchanges that have been fined were dealing in fiat.  They were selling IPOs or outright selling and exchanging fiat for coins.  This requires a license and adherence to certain "know your customer" laws.

If you don't touch fiat, it doesn't apply.  At least not yet in the USA, and although I'm sure they're working on how to regulate crypto currencies, I don't think it will be easy.  It has to be enforceable and apply only to their jurisdiction.

At this point in time, DASH has nothing that needs to be regulated.

your welcome

Complete and total BS being peddled here by this guy. To not compare the volume signatures is to completely mislead.

Your XMR chart above shows a completed pump and dump bubble burst in action from late March to early April.
Lots of volume going up and then it dries out and the sellers get the hell out without any kind of buyers there to cushion the fall.

The fact that it completely gave up the rally it had just made on less volume is clue #1 that the XMR's rally was a complete bs pump.
Next the fact that XMR kept running into that line you drew just above 0.0028 with absolutely trendless volume, and without being able to make a higher-high, was clue #2 that the pump was over and the "Dump Part 2" was about to commence with the next round of weak hands heading for the exit upon a break of that line.

Overall you see none of these same volume signatures in Dash. Instead you see a massive volume increase with price following and then a declining dropoff in volume and a slowing down of the price decline post-rally and an overall basing pattern in price.
This is called "take a breather" phase or "accumulation". Notice, we are still nowhere near the initial price levels, unlike XMR which immediately dropped back initial support and then eventually to those first price levels because it had no actual long-term accumulation taking place in it. Notice, there is a trend in the Dash volume...it is declining drastically as this spring is about to be sprung upwards again...everything points to the next big trend move likely being upwards due to likely imminent news events soon.

JL

i double checked with flare before (as he did not update to 23)
he said only wallets have to be on 23
not MN's !

Edit
i am surprised as well that this goes so slow

Or don't fully understand what they are voting on.

If the Nasdaq are colouring bitcoins, I suggest they use the Dash transaction locking somehow, because 10 minutes is a looooong time in the stock world!
https://coincenter.org/2015/05/wall-street-is-using-bitcoin-not-just-the-blockchain/

Nasdaq will initially leverage the Open Assets Protocol, a colored coin innovation built upon the blockchain.
Now, you could color the coins on some other blockchain, say Dogecoin or Litecoin, but we’re fairly certain that Nasdaq is coloring bitcoins. Michael Casey of the Wall Street Journal, who broke the story, ...

I also like chart analysis, but I try to look past that and focus on the up take and general usage of a coin by how many new exchanges its incoporated on and what new websites are adding as their list of 4 or 5 favoured coins. For example these pairs are too my liking,
https://usecryptos.com/market/DASH-EUR
At the end of the day, what matters is real world use, not the latest spot price.

I was able to vote with v.22 (both local and server side). As I understand - v.23 is only needed for additional ability to see voting results (+ some non-voting additional functions).
My ideas about "so many people haven't voted yet":
1. Some people want to feel like "the only decision maker" - to vote in last moment - so even with small amount of their MNs "determine the whole result by themselves".
2. Many people just didn't understand all details about this proposition and following corrections (For example - foreigners. For example - for me explanation was too complicated and I can' get it 100% clear. But I voted anyway because I think we have to start with something now. Another type of people will act only when they understand 100% easy and clear). So they may decided to wait until further simplistic explanations.
3. Big MN OPs think the have voted, but some percentage of their votes have reset to ABSTAIN (for example due to MN go offline for more than 1 hour). And it is not any easy way for them to check this out.
4. Some Big MN OPs may decided not to vote to mention in a future that "decision got >50% EVEN WITHOUT their involvement!".
5. Some MN OP are "sleeping"... May be we need a mandatory update to wake them up?

Number 6: Voting apathy,complacency and lack of understanding of how to cast the vote.

Suggest having voting button on the top of the wallet that casts a Yea or Nay to make it as lemon squeezy as possible.
(highlights on detection of masternode status)