Are you going to tag everyone on this list ?
The top 1000 most posts/topics deleted by moderators report lists users by the count of posts and/or topics they've had deleted by the moderators of bitcointalk.org.

If the reason you're tagging a user is simply because some of their posts have been removed by a moderator "50 post or more". I think you should tag everyone on that list. I don't think anyone who is on your personal blacklist should be tagged because maybe that's just your assumption based on data on bpip.org. People can still find out just by looking at the bpip site. Please explain to me if what I said above was something wrong.

On the contrary, I would say that you are a loser, brother.
Since you have an alternative account with which you participate today in the same subscription company.
And this is already a negative red label.

Maybe you want to argue and say that this is just a coincidence, registration in one day?

About the neutral feedback you guys received, I don't think you should be worried or so annoyed about it. I know it could have hurt your feelings a little because it says something about your posting style, but it's just a neutral and not a negative feedback. Usually members here don't even pay attention to neutral feedback that much

Was this a slight mistake, or you meant every word you said there? 

I'm not against on this one because I cannot deny myself to be on the list of "Most Post/Topics deleted by Moderators", I got banned for a week because of this one and I think I've already learned my lesson.

This feedback hurt me a little because of being called as a worst spammer of all time, but I still respect actmyname.
Only if I can do something about this one, I'll keep on working and improving myself until i made myself out of that list (even if it seems impossible).

I wonder why Im on the list, while I only made 20 posts in last 4 months. what kind spammer standards are used.
I bet you are a good person for this forum, and want to make this forum even better.
but if what you do is wrong you will only make this forum worse.
do a review on my account and check whether what you do is right.
 

Well. If tagging account based on deleted posts in the past, I don't think that's objective. Because currently I'm trying to improve my posts quality and not posting unnecessary lately.
Even though it's just a neutral tag.  As a bitcointalk member I am really disappointed to be tagged because of my error that occurred in the past, I'm just an easy target if it sort.

Hi!  I didn't know I am part of the top 1000 spammer until actmyname tag me.  I have been on and off the forum but I see this as a positive act, at least in my POV.  this enable us (those on the list) at least to improve ourselves.   This sure is a tiring job since the ranking constantly change  .  I hope actmyname's tag is kept up to date as to not negatively affect those who are trying to improve their posting quality.  Don't get butthurt because we are tagged, instead let us use this as motivation to improve our posting quality.

It's not the first time you were tagged for being a spammer. I'm sorry that I wasn't fast enough: I should have added these ratings as soon as I started reporting you.

If neutral feedback bothers you that much then you should consider how you ever got to the point where you thought, "let me write 10 pages of consecutive spam posts". Three pages into your post history, you can start to see the same level quality as the posts I typically report. If you want to say that you've changed, then that's okay, but you haven't been doing much posting since those replies were deleted. How am I supposed to know that all of a sudden, you are now able to write incredible responses with renewed vigor?

---

For the record, almost all of the users who have triple-digit good reports had entire pages of posts reported: that's how much spam they were generating alone. I can understand that you want to "change" but would you have done so yourself, had I not reported those posts?

I usually remember the usernames of the worst spammers out there. For some reason, I don't remember yours, so I must have done the bulk of the reporting in just a few days or even a single day. What does that say about the quality I saw?

Well I can accept the reasons you give. Indeed I made a stupid mistake in the past and now get it again. The first Neutral Tag really really influences the way someone views my post, the moderators mostly delete my posts even though I think it is still in standard and doesn't spam.  Even though I'm not as bad as people think and there are still many users who are more worsen than me maybe they are luckier than me.  I've finished in this thread.  Thank you for the explanation