any respond here? when tournament? when freezes will be fixed? when reconnect function will work properly? love your game... invest 2 eth in cards)

Isn't that a just an old third party site? I am thinking that they just forgot to delete that page. Also it wanted over 0.2 eth for fees when i clicked that so i am not going to investigate any further. Safest way is the trading in the official gu client or in tokentrove.

How many players does this game currently have? I saw a review https://revain.org/blockchain-games/gods-unchained, but not much information was disclosed, and certainly not a word about the number of players. I wouldn't want to start playing a Gods Unchained that has a small community and doesn't increase.

https://unchainedstats.com

Unchainedstats say I'm ranked at spot 1592
I'm level 43
I think it's impossible to be less than 4000

You can find out if you sign up and check your rank at unchainedstats before you play a game.
You should be ranked with all those that didn't play a game yet.

And seems to be slow and buggy process too because once when i tried to fuse i lost some flux but fusing never happened. I reported it already but got no answer.

No, is just jammed few times and took flux just once. It will be lot's of work to fuse diamond legendaries in the future. I wonder what they will be worth, because you can't just get lucky and buy them like in ico, and because of flux, bots aren't dumping cards to markets. They will be super rare.

I have cards....game is fun.  Will it take off?  Hopefully.  The F2P/play to earn players are annoying though....they're too good and they just keep getting better. Playing GU is how they pay their bills so they're always playing.

I'm pondering the ramifications of tying the Etherbots markets to the Gods Unchained markets and wondering if anybody considered the efficacy of that marketing strategy.

From the Graziadio Business Review:

"....The historical trend indicates that tie-in arrangements that can be supported by arguments of efficiency factors that improve the company’s bottom line without harming social or consumer welfare may well stand on firm legal footing with positive support from economic considerations. However, tie-in arrangements that cannot be supported adequately by these arguments may expose the company to costly legal action, especially when the company is a dominant player in the tying good. This is accentuated by the fact that such legal action is subject to triple damages.

All product arrangement decisions must consider the typical risk/return factors inherent in all business decisions. In this case it is particularly important for the manager to fully evaluate a potential tie-in arrangement, consider the legal and economic environment, anticipate future financial benefits and costs, and minimize the risk exposure for the company." (Graziadio Business Review, Volume 11, Issue 2, 2008)

Any thoughts?


Further contextual reading:

https://www.justice.gov/atr/competition-and-monopoly-single-firm-conduct-under-section-2-sherman-act-chapter-5

https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/single-firm-conduct/tying-sale-two-products