Sorry for my previous posts that were a type of attack on you. I was having a crap morning and suffered from some nerd rage. I actually think you have some valid points. I am not aware of any coin that has had an IPO that was successful. And there has been much with this coins that could be seen as an indication the people behind it are not technical enough to get it working.
The point I was trying to make (and doing it poorly) by saying all coins are a pump and dump and saying we are all in an experiment is this. (I hope)
Just because a coin with an IPO has not worked in the past does not necessarily mean that it will not work in the future. Stack coins, Panda had premines that were marketed for stability and longevity or whatever. IN this case it is for the purchase of GPU (diferent? Not sure). I think in this case it is a better idea than the previous ones. My point is that unless these things are tried no one knows. If this turns out to be a scam we all learn a little bit more about how to avoid them, if it is a partial success we will learn what works and what does not work. I feel like you have decided that this will not work and are not giving it a chance. If you do indeed care about seeing crypto work, you would be for experimenting and finding out what works (since nothing yet has seemed to work that well).
I think that if the OP can get GPU in stock it will at least supply some constant buy pressure in the market that is not really present in other coins. If anything this will slow down the death of this coins a bit, but it COULD give it stability.
Again sorry for coming down on you. I hope this does work, but realistically we do not know. But that is not a bad thing.
Phad. This post was rushed so sorry if it is not coherent or does not address all that has been said.
PM me if you want to, or we can discuss on here.
Lot of rage here so I am not mad if one uses harsh words. One brings up one point of doubt hes instantly attacked, especially with coins where IPO holders try to defent their pelts of the bears that have not been shot yet (don't know here if you are in the IPO but I mean it generally anyhow). That's understandable, but doesn't prove them right.
I honestly thought (hoped) after wolong's huge failure and 250 BTC lost, that people with bloody noses won't run against walls again and the next coins would become more intelligent, sparkling with real features and inventions, bringing fair profit for all involved and some hope for a future. But obviously there is still much space for some to put up the same game again and again.
About the GPU stock, there was another coin with a market at launch, it had no premine, no IPO but tried to approach the problem with instamine. Unfortunatly that was one of the reason why it didn't lift off: People didn't get insane amounts of coins at the first blocks and lost interest quickly, now the price drops steadily. But buying stuff before it's in stock, just out of promises? Then the CEO isn't even able to get his guys together (and no, launching a coin is not a thing, other do that in few days), fails badly several times at launch, but he wants to organize bounty and constant development with the IPO? Sorry, honstestly, if I say, that sane people shouldn't buy into this. Besides I honestly do believe, that a successful coin with reasonable people having interest in it, should not have any problem to collect donations for bounties and exchanges (and if it is only votes and some reddit-shilling or similar) - anyhow, no one needs premine for that let alone IPO.
If one puts a sale on eBay claiming "cheap GPUs, we don't have them yet but you will get them as soon as we get this business running!" and then fail several times, expressing total idiocy... would anyone here actually buy that? I expected too much from humans, if people really buy that.
