you miss the point entirely.
do what u want i said what needed to be said
regardless im still holding on to my 3mili MYR.
Nothing you said needed to be said. You are trying to advocate for the accommodation of criminal activity, by pointing out that someone else is doing something criminal, albeit completely unrelated to the activity you wish to support. I'm glad you're supporting Myr, but I don't agree with your assertions.
It's one thing to advocate for CPU miners, it's something else entirely to advocate for bot herders, and then blame the NSA for giving them access to infected machines. It's just a bullshit rationale and you know it.
It needed to be said because I felt it needed to be said.
CPU miners are a group of people too.
And I thought my rushed explanato on how Bitcoin has taken a profound role as another check and balance would be known by members of the community allowing me to take another step forward past the increased security and inclusiveness of the coin and explain a side benefit on a larger scale in freedom and privacy this could bring.
The NSA is responsible for forcing companies to use much weaker security and even leave backdoors open. How you are in dispute with that blows my mind.
How can you not understand this. It is shocking to me how someone can be a member of this community and be so closed minded and unwilling to even try to understand others perspectives.
Idk why I am replying as your response will likely confirm this. I find it rather depressing as I hold the bitcoin community in such high regard.
We all know the NSA and other groups are behind the backdoors found in intel cpus for example, but that doesn't mean they are to blame for botnets, which was how your post came through, apparently finding a justification for botnet users, which still are criminals and are the ones to blame for taking advantage of people's 'not so safe' cpus.
Thank you for a more polite response than I was willing to give.
iamphoenix, here is the gist of my complaint with your "point"...
gpus are fine, asics are fine, now how about something for the botnet people this is a coin for everyone correct? and let them dump it gives more liquidity for people wanting to buy
and those botnets ... how did they get that access to those computers? it is because ,for example, the NSA colluded with yahoo CEO to leave a backdoor open for their spying... guess who found that backdoor? hackers who now control lots of computers because of the fascism created NSA obomanation. they deserve to be included in "A COIN FOR EVERYONE"
now lets find a viable CPU algorithm
In the bold, did you not just make the claim that if "this is a coin for everyone", it should be made more accessible to bot herders?! Seriously?! And then you go on to justify the view that bots are people too, because...NSA?
Personally, I have ZERO respect for someone with this kind of view, hence the rather blunt responses. You blame a government agency for weakening the populace, and then you do what, fight back against said agency or government? Heck no. You attack the weakened populace in order to make a buck. Drop your jacked up justification. You're a despicable con man preying on the weak and blaming your actions on someone other than yourself.
On a side note, can you point me to any botnets that relied on weakened RNG's to infect their hosts?
EDIT:
Removed vulgarities.
