Thanks! 

I personally want to raise the amount of coins. Let's all decide what amount exactly. Give it to vote.

Are you working at Tesco, bro?

Hello there,
I'm really happy that the proposal for the new coin is supported by so many of you. This surely stimulates the development team to work with yet more passion.

So, firstly please let me thank you all for sharing your ideas, feelings and suggestion: all of these are and will be evaluated with great attention, assuming that good ideas come from knowledge, background and - very important - by sharing our proposals and speaking our mind to a wide community. And this replies to Marty1972.

Secondly, to reply to Frangomel, let me clarify the most important point: this is a NEW coin, it's not a swap or something derived from 66. Who would join in a community that is named after and looks like a project that has just failed because of a management suddenly set to zero, thus causing all of us lose money and time? Nobody, I presume. We will turn the page.
Then, about the other questions, I confirm that the development and support team will be introduced along with the coin, in order to start working immediately in the right way: taking care of the customer and never leaving him alone. But for the moment, please understand that currently they are working hard and it's best to avoid stimulating them too much; it's better if one person, me, acts as interface.

As such, thirdly I want to reply to SaintFrantic. The team has its management that drives the development process, and all are spending their time and investing their money to create something good, taking all the risks for that. On the other hand, it is paramount that the team is always open to endorse and implement each and every good proposal coming from the community, through a positive discussion like the one happening here.

And lastly, please let me remind that you are not taking any development risk, you are not asked any donation to the team or something: you participate to the discussion, get continously informed about what is happening and, in a few days, you will be given the possibility to use your old, unfortunately dead coins to get brand new coins managed in a more fruitful way. That is your opportunity.

Finally, hoping I've replied to all questions, I would like to start debating about the first topic (other ones are coming soon): the coin metrics. With regards also to what already shared within the community, only 66 total coins is not a winning idea. To "feel" the richness you need far more coins.
So, the orders of magnitude for those values are thought as follows:
- 200-500 million coins
- 50-200 coins per block
- around 2 blocks per minute
- difficulty updated after every block.

Those values are meant to meet an optimistic forecast where 1$ equals 10-100 coins, and blocks (that is, coins) are distributed quite quickly.

Looking forward to receiving your opinion about the above, I thank you in advance for your time.

To JaroBe,
to reply to your proposal, as said, it's best to avoid any psychological link to 66 coin. Also, we have not to follow the same rules of 66 (i.e. repeating obsessively the chosen number). Also, your suggestion to premine is correct: it's a "necessary evil" to grant free access to the coin market for all of us, 66 coin owners. All the rest will be used for giveaways, to stimulate as much as possible the diffusion of the coin. And we all have a role on that.
Hope you are happy with the above.

To Frangomel,
I have nothing to do, neither fortunately nor unfortunately, with 66 developers or management. I don't know pikimunga or anyone behind him. As a matter of fact, I can't influence in any way the closure of 66 project. The project for new coin and the one for the 66 coin are fully independent. Hope this replies to your question.

So it is just another coin made on source of 66? Is there pikimunga on planet Earth or....?

Dear segaazel,
your numbers are noted. In addition, I'm really happy to hear your opinion, also because I can tell you that it is hundred percent supported: the doge is a very good model to look at, and as such I fully agree with you that its success is largely due to the kind and careful support to the community of users. We plan to try and act in a way to achieve similar results, and once more the marketing of the coin, tasked to the whole community, is the key to its success.

Dear marty1973,
your advice is noted. And more than that, I'm once more happy to notice that all your proposals are somehow merging together into a reasonable, common and collective way of thinking about the new coin that I fully support.
This project is driving in the right direction, and is tuning properly all setting - like the one subject to the current discussion - also thanks to the contribution of you all.
Thanks a lot for that, it's more than appreciated.
Looking forward to hearing other points of view about the subject settings, best regards to you all.

Ok. On the case then.
 First of all we need to agree what is the coin going to be used for. Then we have to decide on how many coins. 
 We need to do something completely unique here. I have know idea what coding skill everyone here has I personally don't have any. I know what I want to see as functionally in the wallet. What I have seen so far is just ridiculously simple no vision. I think a great looking and functional wallet in which you would be able to do a lot more than just send coins in and out, and do some POS is vital. So depending on what we have as programmers is very important for what we can implement. I want reveal what I have as an ideas for that here. If we reach agreement and make a team I will discuss than then.
  So let's make small team of 5-8 people plus the community as start. Then discuss what we can do about Algo, Coin wallet functionality and so on then  let community vote. Afterwards implement do features. So If you want let's make new threat and start voting for team members first.   

I see you guys are considering starting a new coin, but I don't really see how this relates to 66coin itself. Wouldn't it be better to get the supporters of this coin together and take over the source, the communication and the coin itself? Piku did this before, but he bailed. Maybe someone else is up for the challenge?

At the Cryptocoin Revival Foundation we did this for Quarkbar and is has proven to be extremely effective!