Thank you both for confirming.
But that still leaves the question why my actual balance in my wallet doesn't match the explorer, I really didn't worry about it and I'm still not too concerned. Only reason I spoke up was because of the trex balance mystery, otherwise I still wouldn't care.
Edit: It's been incorrect for months, I've been watching it. deleted blockchain, doesn't do anything. Would extract private keys next, but I'm not on that level. But it still doesn't make sense since explorer shows more than what I have with less transactions. So weird, but whatever.
A couple things about the differences in transaction count.
a) The wallet transaction tab does not count transactions out of your wallet from the given address, the explorer is counting these transactions out.
- your transaction tab will only show that you sent coins to Bittrex ( or where ever), and not which address sent them.
b) The wallet transaction tab could have unconfirmed transactions in there from a fork, the explorer would not count these.
For all my addresses, the explorer transaction count is higher due to reason a.
What do you think is the best way to represent the transaction count in a block explorer ?
1) show a total count like it is now.
2) only show transactions in count.
3) show both in and out transactions, have a counter for each.
I have no clue how hard it is to change the explorer to 2 or 3, I am more so just curious on what would be the ideal solution.
I certainly don't want to infer more work on killsig, as he has already put countless hours of his spare time into building this explorer from the ground up.
