I did not know that; i.e. I forgot about this case. Interesting..
Seems they have
explained details about accusation and as far as I know accuser got paid partially.
Then it's partially settled, the scam accusation is still open until fully paid.
It was completely settled given that the accuser took a compensation and left.
Eventually there is no any response from accuser and he is offline from long time.
You cannot expect a reply from a person whose already offline for a long time, the explanation of sportsbet is more relevant than any other under the situatioin, and if the problem was really resolved, DT members would have remove the tag.
FYI, of the 5 DT who painted Duckdice, 4 of them are still very active, so why is it no one of them remove their rating?
In the part of the post that you're quoting he is talking about Sportsbet, not DuckDice IMO. There is zero reason to remove any ratings on DuckDice.
Those accusation are lately open they are responding as well. If there is proven scam, never mind I will leave campaign and will be happy to tag them. If you have free time you can review that case.
We need Lauda's opinion on this. I've deleted my rating on Sportsbet and added a neutral one.
As a general thumb rule, one should not even attempt to join a campaign which is advertising a site and the site has open scam accusations against them by trustworthy members here. Its understandable that majority of the users here were not here when it happened but at least you should be doing a due diligence and check out which company you are going to advertise before jumping into wearing their signature.
People here are so much more interested in getting a share of the free cash that they forget to do research and a basic checkup. I would not say this if a scam accusation comes up after the campaign has started since that is beyond the scope of diligence prior to joining. But in this case its pretty much known to many older members and within the click of a few buttons for new members who are willing to join.
This.
