Seems appropriate, I was once a fan of the exchange after using it on multiple occasions might reconsider using their service if they can amend their ways. When I first saw the new signature, i thought they have resolve the scam accusation but seems they just ignore the worries of the community like every other shady businesse operator would had and still went on to created a new campaign to promote their services. Businesses that consider their reputation as a priority won't do such act.

I believe the type 1 flag is appropriate even if they return the funds being held in hostage to the affected user.

All points mentioned in this topic still apply. Just because they paid back one affected customer, this is still something to consider when dealing with them (especially for newbies) and the remaining points still stay valid.


Overall, everyone is at high-risk when dealling with them in any way. Regardless of whether the affected user receives his money back or not.

I'd never heard of this exchange until now, and I agree with this completely:

....except for the fact that personally I've never had a problem with Yobit and don't think they're completely a scam exchange.  I get the point entirely.

There's enough evidence presented in the OP such that I can--and did--support the flag.  Maybe they can rehabilitate their reputation, maybe not.  We'll see.

I am going to participate in their campaign to recoup some of my losses.

Last year I deposited into one of their Altcoins that had the exact same name as another altcoin. I sent in my tokens and they were locked in a ETH address generated by them. And then it turned out to be the contract address. Long story. I have now forgotten what that coin was. My support ticket history is also deleted.

I am trying to search my email as well, so far no luck.


edit

Even though I said and expressed my intent to participate in this signature campaign. The fact remains, that I never associated myself with any promotion that Livecoin has conducted here or anywhere on the internet.

I am going to milk them dry for all the money they kept from me. This is the closest I can get to them paying me a dime of what I deposited on their site.

Don't try to come to me lecturing about morals, none of you broke your backs trying to earn that money I lost to Livecoin.


Technically

It was my fault, I should have checked the ultra small link that led me to the asset's contract page and match it with what I thought it was representing. I didn't care about the money back then, but this year after I faced a slew of a serious medical emergency, I am trying to make every penny count.

Also,

Them not paying a user their funds because they complained is totally wrong and I do not support such a decision. I think I made that clear in one of my past posts. I can't remember when/where.

That is deeply concerning. If only there was a way to track IPs .. wink wink?

Not sure if you're being sarcastic or whatever but was the supposed to mean that I'm behind the new account and managing the campaign? If that's the case, I don't think the admins should waste their time finding my IP's, I'll just give them on my own lol for a terrible manager I'm. You're defending them and I can clearly see why's that.

These are the basics of decentralization.

Are we allowing all the ICOs to collect this forum member's money after verifying their address ?

If you are okay with a services then use them else look for another services. Freedom of choice. Trying to bridge centralized things will collapse all the essence of decentralization.

Mr.Satoshi stayed anonymous and left anonymous for the same reason.[/list]

Pre-emptive flags will make entire forum paralyzed.

There are hundreds of ponzi and potential scam in the name of gambling and altcoins but you people are instead of spending your time on those, supporting the people who are targeting a business with baseless points. And this is where I am afraid you people are misusing the trust system which may result in paralyzing the decentralized environment.