wich publickey's private key you need, what range.?
@DESKTOP-EAVG3O8:/mnt/d/bsgs-development$ python3.9 bsgs_hybrid_dll_secp256k1.py -n 20000000000000000 -pfile puzzle_pubs.txt -b bPfile.bin -bl bloomfile.bin -keyspace 800000000000000000000000000000:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF -rand
- Starting Program : BSGS mode with hybrid algo using bloom dll and secp256k1 dll Version [ 13072021 ]
- Loading 75 Public Keys to search
- Search Mode: Random Start after every n sequential key search
- Reading bloom filter from file complete in : 350.20511 sec
- Reading Baby table from file complete in : 0.13070 sec
- seq value: 20000000000000000 m value : 20000000000
- Search Range: 0x1 to 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
- k1: 0x38b63a35d47e0ca8b7dd83abeb1c3177
- PVK not found. 20000.00000 Trillion scanned in 12.01 sec. New range
- k1: 0xca5da4b0e249fc9673b61fa0576ca7a1
and right now the terakeys is doing 2200 teras Kang 23552 Elapsed 20 sec.ram 24.6MB 45.7MB
Again, key/s is all in how the coder, coded their program.
Long discussion, especially concerning BSGS.
Jean Luc's version, if this program counts like the other BSGS program did, would be considered to get 14.6 PKey/s...that is 14,600 TKey/s. People get caught up with dazzling numbers without running the same exact tests to compare such claims, or speeds of programs. I don't know about this program as I have not used it but again, a similiar discussion already exists and at the end of the day, JLPs version was faster and when comparing times and speeds of what was going on under the hood, if JLP wanted to, he could have changed the speed read out to 14.6 Petakeys/s.
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5238719.msg54243367#msg54243367 Read from the 1st post if need be.
