Guess that is the sentiment of frustrated people towards their holding since they are really disappointed for the performance of BFG token so let them have freedom to express their feelings towards this token since this is valid sentiments and they are posting this on BFG thread. This discussion will subside once they see some growth and there's also exciting events held on their casino so lets be open for other discussion and try to understand people talking about that since its not really stressful especially if those people still have huge BFG balances on their wallet.

If BFG team will just post about some updates or answer questions here maybe we can see less people talking about the token but rather they talk about their experience about on their casino.

Yet you open again another price discussion topic with this post. The only none price discussion on this post of yours is the opening statement that you encourage to discuss other topic other than price. 

Seriously, Your suggestion such as petition is nonsense since BFG token is a utility not a security token that only means the teams has no legal obligation to distribute profit to all token holders. The only thing investors can do about the price is to express their feelings on the social media channel which the team often ignore.

Yes, and even then they would be doing the right thing in the wrong opportunity, because obviously they have been successful with the token, people buy the BFG token and can generate a lot of money, but it is as you say if they do not take advantage of the opportunity to get the juice of this token, who else is going to get it? They have a good project, they have a good casino, but they have gotten stuck in things that they don't understand, I don't know what problems they have, I don't know why in bitcointalk they have the ability to ignore users when they have a tremendous gold mine in their hands, because those toekns have a lot of durability if they work on them from now on, if they develop more, they add better features, because they could make a difference, I don't know why things when they come from the casinos, and from the market, they don't get along well, because it's money on both sides, because a little more liquid money on the token side, so these things are what they don't assimilate, I don't know if those in charge of the token want this to go ahead, or if swol they want to be happy with the casino, but they are wasting the opportunity of their lives, this is something that you cannot say no to, I don't understand why sometimes there are people or work teams that have everything to succeed and they run away from them, So they are so chaotic that I will never understand them.

They started off hard, if so, why don't they do it again? Why don't they improve and carry out a radical campaign of social networks, signature campaigns and everything like they did in the beginning, that does help raise the price , it helps a lot if they create a good Community so that they buy the toekns, and when bitcoin achieves a good bullish rally, the token may be so well located in the market that it will also rise , because Investors put money there as a refuge, then if things are like this, why are they going to throw everything away? Rail? It's incredible , but there are people who at least Wait for an Opportunity and here they waste it.

Is it that way or the other way around. The real question that should be asked here, should they promote the token so much that it brings in people to the casino, or should they promote the casino so much that it makes people buy the token? I believe that it is more about the casino, if they promote the casino as much as possible then they are going to end up with something decent without a doubt and will end up with a good return for sure.

I think it should be noted that we are going to end up with something that will benefit them one way or another, and could be done in a way that would benefit them a lot. I know that it is not going to be all that easy, but we could definitely end up seeing the casino helping the token out.

I believe that it is a huge part of the casino since it started and that is why talking about is justified. Plus, if there was a BFG token topic at the altcoin part of this forum (which as far as I am aware, there are none) that would mean that the token talks could happen there and casino talks could happen here, but since there are none, token talks happen here as well.

That's not really a bad idea to be fair, I think it should be very important to notice because it leaves people no other choice but to talk about it here and should be something that we could enjoy. I get that it may not be all that simple but as long as we could do it, we should be able to do it properly and not really end up with anything that is shocking or different in the end.

Well, one thing that I think is common with casino tokens is that they lack ideas for utility, most especially, if you try to look for utility that will relate to gambling, such ideas is very limited if at all there is any.
Talking about fun token, to consider the free spins they give to holders as a utility is actually wrong if you ask me, and this is due to the fact that they can still give their users free spins even without the holding any token if they want, for example, the ability they offer their users to buy spins with reward points, which is also earned for free through the faucet system.

Personally, I see every casino token as a speculative token, not utility tokens because when it comes to utility, i do not see anything unique about the utility of casino tokens.

Not going to be a surprising action if there's nothing to expect, even there are still token holders who continue to stake their tokens and waiting for some good run in terms of value of the coin, sooner or later if they don't feel that the team will update something that may create a good run then the next thing to do is to sell it out and find another asset to invest in.

A common reaction from traders' side, always trying to find an edge with the asset that they are supporting for now, staking and hoping, is what keeps holders to keep their asset on hold.

And there's the fact that you get muted in the telegram group for voicing concerns, even when you are being polite, so this is the only place to speak up. And i wasn't even disappointed back then. I was just asking questions. I didn't even once complained about the price. I asked about what game theory they had for the tokenomics and how can they market in a way that others have been sued for.

I guess we have our answer now... By rejecting all the regions that can sue them.

But that doesn't make much sense , the Fact that they want to continue keeping the Token in a decentralized exchange, because currently it is almost as if not well regarded, it is known that despite all the regulations that have been and will be , people prefer centralized exchanges because we know that there at any time the most Famous coins go up in price , in fact there was a lot of talk about Biannace and other exchanges that are very good at the moment, at one point I proposed that Kucoin, because Basically they did not ask for KYC, now they do Ask for KYC , but even so the volume handled in Kucooin is quite Respectable and can make a Difference in things at any Given moment, a thing like this, the team does not know what their future will be if they will pass it, but I have seen that they are letting that gold mine, all you have to do is look at it, how many designers don't want to be in Betfury's position to take Advantage of those Tokens? How much would I like to be able to be next to someone who has a Project like this to Start doing Contests , bonuses , much Stronger Marketing than what they did in the Beginning ? How many don't like that? Is that sometimes the thing is, when it comes to marketing Directors, they allow themselves to be led by bad decisions, just imagine how much the token would be if they were Making a token with enough Advertising? with great marketing?

These are the things I don't Understand , a thread Ann that is of vital Importance for big players , for big Investors, don't take it into consideration, this is just what I'm talking About, if there is any misunderstanding with a Forum user, or At the Same time, they must fix it, Because they are Basically saying No to money , they Imagine that they will Run a big campaign now, and that bitcoin is at $28k, after bitcoin rises to more than $100k , they Imagine the price of token ? How much would it Cost if he had a Great capacity to be able to Climb, and Everything?