Like all such models, it is worth absolutely nothing minus the value of the time it takes someone to realise that fact. Anyone interested in your model should ask you to pay them to examine your model, or else they're getting ripped off.

Hey, can I use your math model, that seems to work good. Also, someone who claims to be a mathematical analyst on the Internet is not a mathematical analyst, if there really is a math model that accurately predicts the prices of bitcoin market over this coming year, then why tell everybody about it? That kind of thing shouldn't see the light of day, the person that creates that is basically making a gold mine meaning that they should never share this kind of thing and since there is no such thing as accurate math model that can predict the bitcoin's price in the next month or so, it is probably a sham or a scheme to hook in people to pay for a pie chart that has random number put in it, there is a reason why they are called predictions, they are not accurate.

I am quite sure that movements in the cryptocurrency market, especially not general ones, but more specific ones for a short period of time, are impossible to predict. Now millions of people are involved in this market, many of them do not know how the cryptocurrency market works and perform absolutely illogical actions and no program can predict them. Therefore, I don’t believe in such a program and its capabilities with an acceptable error of plus or minus one percent.

It would be priceless as you could always be ahead in trading. But it's impossible, as you can't predict when Elon Must will tweet or not

Your 'predictions' are biased from result-oriented thinking.

Haha  That was hillarious.


Tell me one thing, what's the use of such model even if it exists (although it doesn't). Assuming that the model would predict the ATH 99% accurately (well that's funny too  )
wouldn't it make the traders aware and then they will just start selling their coins right before the ATH. Hence a big sell would occur right before the predicted ATH.
Hence the ATH the model predicted would fail to be accurate. Hence it's just a waste of time.

It's like time travelling to the past and changing something which eventually changes all the course of events from that point till date.

Firstly, the model exists, and I have given you the results for 2013 and 2017, they are true, however unbelievable, this is not made up. Secondly how many people know about  the PLAN B prediction of 288K, and then will act on it. Surely the peak will be just under 288K with that logic, it is the most well known, its been published for almost 2 years and revised last year. Unless main stream media takes hold of it during the mania phase, as almost all people will forget about it having the attention span of a goldfish, it will not be relevant for the most but only a few. If as I have explained before the model predicts a price and therefore market cap number in the trillions of dollars, and say I can have an influence on say 10 Billion dollars (if I don't publish it but rather sell it to one whale) at the peak that is only enough to move the market a few $10's of dollars. For that person/whale/institution who does not want to hold their full bag during the next bear market, what is the fair value?

...boast...linking..., if that was true and I forever remain anonymous where is the boasting. If I come out and full disclosure of model and person and the model is not true where is my boasting. But if I come out and show it is true and who I am I can never go back into anonymity, and I currently put a great deal of value on that. But valid a critique, understandable.

Issue is what is the model worth not who am I, bro

When did you create your model?

Did you create it prior to 2013 and it has been validated twice? Or, did you create it recently and use backtesting to tune it? If it is the latter, then you really have nothing of any value. You can't use backtesting to validate a model created with backtesting.

I would be willing to fly almost anywhere in the world to the right person who could verify the math's and model.