Generating models and testing them against the data until you find one that fits is called "p-hacking". It doesn't matter how many variables there are and whether they are tuned or not. How many models did you try before you "discovered" this one? If the answer is more than 1, then that is p-hacking and you can't use the same data to validate your model.

The issue is that if you derive the hypothesis for the model from the data, then you cannot use the data to prove the hypothesis. It is called "begging the question", which is a kind of circular reasoning. It doesn't mean that your model is wrong. I means that you have absolutely no evidence that it is correct.

Please help, with feedback suggestions on a value or could you say a price discovery endeavor for a mathematical model that I have developed that predicted the BTC 2013 and 2017 highs hundreds of days in advance with over 99 percent accuracy.

I am a self taught analyst that has discovered a mathematical model that predicts the price at which BITCOIN'S blow off top high for this current bull move will/should also occur.

A bold claim I know, but the model predicted the last 2 blow off top highs in 2013 and 2017 with an over 99% accuracy years, yes, really years in advance.

The model predicted price high for 2013: $1,239.43. Actual 2013 high Mt Gox $1,241.92, Cryptocompare.com, 99.79% accurate

The model predicted price high for 2017: $20,038.41. Actual 2017 high $20,088.99 Coinmarketcap.com, 99.63% accurate

AS PROOF THE MODEL EXISTS

The model also predicts that at a price of just over $71K, a corrective pullback to AT LEAST the $57K range will happen, a -20% pullback at a minimum.

PRICE PREDICTION FOR INITIAL/INTRUM PULLBACK (please allow a +/- 1% deviation):

BINANCE $71,996

BRAVE NEW COIN BLX $71,924

BITSTAMP $71,777

BITFINEX $71,477

edit: Coinmarketcap.com $73,240*

 (edit *an important note, there could be an exchange in USD that I have not analysed that does the interim turning point with a +99% ie  for the 2017 ATH Coinmarketcap.com $20088.99   99.74% accurate, not all will be +99% accurate, just ONE needs to be, its not a wiggle out, just how it seemed to work last 2 cycles, though it could surprise me, so I have included coinmarketcap.com also. I cant wait to see what happens, shouldn't be long, complete ATH blow off top should be between 18th-25th of September 2021, that is not the models prediction just some other research has shown me).

The model then predicts a blow off top price high for the CURRENT bull run of: $XXX,XXX, I will not disclose that yet, but I am very interested in the price discovery of that information. What is that price prediction worth? I have my thoughts on that but am very interested on what full disclosure of the mathematical model would be worth to a billion dollar institution, or private individual as Bitcoin holders are a diverse bunch now. Or as my model indicates me to believe, in a very short time Bitcoin will have a multiple trillion dollar market cap. What is that worth?

Reference [1] investing.com Feburary 23 2014 06:30AM ET, Mt Gox all time high of $1241.10 https://www.investing.com/news/forex-news/bitcoin-spikes-almost-200-on-mt.-gox-withdrawal-rumors-267966

each years ATH is based on pure random speculation.
there are no puzzles/equations to solve an ATH.

you cannot predict an ATH

you can however predict a fair YL(year low) based on:
how much it costs to mine that year
how much it cost to mine in previous year
how much % of circulating coins moved in that year.

then you can base how much of that circulation had been 'bought'/mined for and thus know what number the majority would refuse to sell below.

however you cant play the same equation to work out a high.

An anonymous person with no track record makes an outrageous claim that they are unable to support. What do you expect?

Op, look, you must understand that if you're posting this in 2021 and simply claiming that there was this model that predicted the ATHs of Bitcoin starting with the one in 2013, there's no reason for anyone to believe you. It sounds like a typical scam because there's no proof that this data wasn't simply added into this model since it's publicly available. And even if the model came to correct results about the past, it doesn't mean it is useful for the future and that's the only thing that matters.
What you can do to prove that the model works is post predictions for BTC price in a few months, half a year and a year from now, for instance, and in case they all become true with a very high degree of accuracy, there would probably appear people who are interested in the model. And what you've posted so far sounds too inaccurate to even be accepted as a proper verifiable prediction.

MARK my words. If I am wrong I will admit it. BUT I am not a deceiver, the model is real.