If my country is to adopt bitcoin as a currency and/or legal tender, from what I observed in El Salvador situation. I would advice that my country should first use a minimum of 1 year for sensitisation.
You must have to enlighten the masses, especially the uneducated who uses money to buy bread and butter from groceries and street shops. These are the real users of money. In the case of El Salvador, it was this group of people that staged protest against bitcoin because they were misinformed that bitcoin will be the only means of payment. Proper sensitisation would have evaded that incident.

Secondly, I will advice that my country should employ slow adoption. This can start by building a national exchange and make all civil servants create accounts and start recieving salaries with bitcoin, pay their tax in bitcoin.
From there you can start expanding to other sectors and gradually bitcoin will become part of the people.

From my perspective government will fined it very difficult to adopt the system of cryptocurrency, and especially the country that fails to recognize cryptocurrency as a legal tender. I believe that before countries Will start making cryptocurrency proper adoption of currency thet most be collaboration that will give values from Bitcoin to fiat currency, because since Bitcoin has been created it's few countries that understand it validation and adopt its values.

I personally think that if the country I live in is planning to adopt Bitcoin, the most important approach is the support of the entire community that really understands Bitcoin as a whole. In the first sense there must be some kind of learning that is commonplace where Bitcoin is used as a subject. It aims to find out the roots of how Bitcoin works.

This introduction process took a while, so seeing what El Salvador was doing was too hasty. Because there is an opposition that turns out to be a big enough role in the rejection. The conclusion is the approval of all elements of society as users who will later use Bitcoin. If support for Bitcoin adoption in a country is divided between pros and cons, it will be difficult to achieve the ideal Bitcoin adoption goal.

I don't see a reason for any EU country to adopt bitcoin. They are all too scared to do it because this could potentially be seen as a weakness, an attempt to find other means of making money, a risky investment made by a country that desperately needs to make money. They will allow it to go on, but they won't officially adopt it.

Central banks see it only in black and white. Black - they adopt it and it and it fails costing them money and proving they were naive thinking it could help in any way. White - it becomes popular and undermines their fiat currency, weakening it and allowing people to use something the banks cannot control and make out of thin air. Both options suck for them.

Most advanced countries I think would only accept the existence of bitcoin and other alts. But making it as legal tender? I don't think that will happen. They are already doing great with the use of their local fiat and when they venture in bitcoin, which is a very volatile market, they would find it very challenging in their system. Aside from the fact that they have no full control of its circulation, which most governments are not in favor of.

But in any case my country will decide to have bitcoin as legal tender. I guess, they will find ways now how to tax their citizens who are into crypto. Wherein, a lot of crypto users in my country are still enjoying for not paying tax with their crypto earnings.

People only think what El Salvador did is a failure because their government introduced a centralized wallet but for me it wasn't a big deal at all because its only just a wallet and I think people on their country is not forced to use that wallet. If we think about, we also have centralized exchange and people are in fact loving it over decentralized exchange.

Anyway, if ever my country have adopted btc the way el salvador did, then that's nice. I can now finally spend my bitcoin directly anywhere I like. I expect that a bitcoin city is also going to be made and then we will be seeing bitcoin atm's around, and maybe more optimization and innovation related to btc's are going to come.

what many forget is that there are TWO economic plans...

the government investing in bitcoin is not a short term thing. they are not looking for a quick 'doubling' to then exit. the plan is to buy btc and hoard to hedge against the dollar on a 5-10 year strategy where the first few years is the buy up.
meaning no need to be checking the sell price of btc and value their hoard any time soon.
this means when the price goes down in the next few years, thats discount to buy more.. and is good for the country.
they are not valuing the hoard. they only see the price for opportunity to buy more
in short. you dont lose value on BTC unless you decide to sell at a loss.. no sell=no loss.
hoarding = dont look at the price for now. dont value you hoard at now prices if your not going to sell now.
...
the second economic plan is the citizen use of crypto/alternative to dollar.
this if educated well with the citizens could have gone a hell of alot better. aswell as having a good wallet/system in place without bugs/flaws to make citizens happy to use it.

the chivo wallet didnt give citizens 0.000588 btc upfront. instead it gave them a poorly designed wallet balance of $30 which could be converted to different things, by a poorly designed and under-educated system that had problems, via its altnet method of 'payments'

this citizen use of crypto economic plan is where the 'failure' happened. all because of many flaws in its inception, mainly due to the mis-understanding of what citizens were actually using and also integrating poorly made altnet that had its own flaws, bottlenecks and bad liquidity

this was not a 'bitcoin failed' scenario. it was a 'wallet/altnet failed' scenario, becasue citizens were not actually using btc on their own privkeys at the time.
in 2022 el salvador changed its wallet/payment method away from being related to the altnet (you know which one im talking about but i wont mention because it makes certain people cry when i mention it)

El Salvador hasn't failed. Bitcoin adoption takes years, if not decades, to come to fruition. I don't understand why people believe it is reasonable to expect someone to give up fiat currencies, something they've depended on for ages, for a digital currency with technology they most likely do not understand. Education is the biggest hurdle once government bureaucracy has been surpassed.

Give it time before calling El Salvador's experimentation with Bitcoin a failure. Perhaps the bitcoin community could benefit greatly with patience.

Governments don't like privacy and they will try to find out who owns bitcoin if they start adopting it. Decentralization will become centralized when its holders deal with the government especially when they start using centralized exchange. You also have to report your tax obligations to the government if the government makes tax rules, it will more or less make your privacy open.

Can someone tell me about the Chivo wallet, is it also centralized as it is El Salvador's national bitcoin wallet?

We are also talking about multiple sizes when we are talking about these nations. So for example, El Salvador may not have a huge income and investment chance, hence why it may look like "failed", which is something that bitcoin haters wants you to think, they invested only like a year ago, maybe not even that long ago, what happened to "long term investment"? Maybe they will benefit from this immensely in 10 years? Who knows?

This is why we should be considering this not as a failure yet. However, even if we do, my nation could make this much purchase per month, and that shows you how different nations could approach differently and could have different results.