Don't you see that the text is not what you wrote? It is rewritten in other words. It's not about correcting grammatical or punctuational mistakes, it's about style rewriting, so it changes what is written. Why do you need to lose your individuality? One thing is to correct mistakes and totally the different is to rewrite a text in a different style.

I have been a Bitcointalk user since 2017, my username is r_victory. I am 44 years old and I am a translator. Also, I have lived in Brazil since I was born, my favorite team is Corinthians and I am writing this text without the help of artificial intelligence.

The best-known Brazilian soccer player after Pelé is Neymar. His career began at Santos, and he has played for several teams around the world, such as Barcelona, ​​for example. However, the Brazilian national soccer team is not doing well in the World Cup qualifiers.

The problem of course is the payee can’t verify that one of the owners did not double-spend the coin. A common solution is to introduce a trusted central authority, or mint, that checks every transaction for double spending. After each transaction, the coin must be returned to the mint to issue a new coin, and only coins issued directly from the mint are trusted not to be double-spent. The problem with this solution is that the fate of the entire money system depends on the company running the mint, with every transaction having to go through them, just like a bank.

The traditional banking model achieves a level of privacy by limiting access to information to the parties involved and the trusted third party. The necessity to announce all transactions publicly precludes this method, but privacy can still be maintained by breaking the flow of information in another place: by keeping public keys anonymous. The public can see that someone is sending an amount to someone else, but without information linking the transaction to anyone. This is similar to the level of information released by stock exchanges, where the time and size of individual trades, the “tape”, is made public, but without telling who the parties were.

In the next SVN rev, I'll make it only go back to the last checkpoint at block 74000.  If we need to correct a problem in the future, we can always make sure it goes back at least as far back as the problem.  Also, I'm adding code to verify the block index, which means the proof-of-work chain is checked.

Still, the system won't be entirely secure against your blk*.dat files.  You are trusting someone if you use a copy of their blk files.

That's why we don't make the final conclusions based on any single one detector. Each can give a false positive. And that's why we are searching for multiple cases of AI usage, so that to be sure that the user is using AI for his posts and that's not an occasional false positive.

I have noticed that Copyleaks sometimes works by detecting AI where there is none.

The problem is, when you ask AI to find the grammatical errors and fix them, it actually changes the wording and rewrites it for you. It provides you with a similar response if your prompt is like "write a reply to this post,". Your original content does not remain original anymore. According to ChatGPT, that is a polished version of your text.

But I tried a command "find grammatical errors and fix them without changing any words," and it worked fine. It just changes the punctuation and the typos. I couldn't even notice what changes it made. But I don't think I need it since I am using Grammarly already, which fixes typos automatically.

Is Grammarly not using AI for the correction? Everything I later realized about Grammarly was that it is an AI tool. I remember a time my brother told me about it like 3 years ago or more, that is good and I later consider to download it. It truly fixed typos but it corrected the sentences sometimes like it reconstructed it. It increased my posting time, it increased the time I used for the corrections and yet I still have to read what it corrected it to. All these later made it boring to me and it takes more of my time and I deleted it.

I do not use AI or any other tools but I post naturally. As for me, f**k AI and any other correction tools.

You’re really digging into the tough side of gambling with this breakdown of addiction stages. It connects to your earlier thoughts on the cycle of promising to quit but then slipping back in, especially with crypto betting sites like Parimatch or Primedice. The $173 a month you mentioned could easily fit into that risky pattern if it fuels bets. Let’s explore this while keeping it focused. The winning stage you described is tricky. Those early wins feel like free money, especially on crypto sites where Bitcoin bets are quick and the excitement hits hard. Parimatch’s flashy bonuses or Primedice’s fast dice rolls can make you feel on top of the world at first. Then the losing stage sneaks in, and you’re rightit’s the memory of winning that keeps you hooked, making you think one more bet will change everything. By the chasing stage, it’s a nightmare, with people borrowing money or worse to chase losses. The anonymity of crypto can make it even easier to fall into this trap without anyone noticing. Your source is spot on: addiction develops quietly. By the desperation phase, quitting feels impossible when you’re struggling financially. Using Bitcoin on these sites keeps the network active, which you want for BTC’s use, but gambling addiction distorts that into a trap. To prevent falling into that cycle, especially with $173 a month on the line, try setting firm limits ike only depositing $40 a week. You can also use Parimatch’s responsible gambling tools to cap your bets. Self-observing, as you mentioned, is essential. Recognizing the early signs, like betting more than intended or hiding it from others, can help you stop before you reach desperation. I’m curious about your thoughts on this. Are you noticing any of these stages in yourself, or are you just looking into the risks? Is that $173 your betting budget, or something else? Also, do you prefer sports betting on Parimatch or dice games on Primedice? Share a bit more about what’s on your mind, and maybe we can figure out some practical steps to enjoy the experience without falling down the rabbit hole.

ey, I totally get where you're coming from, and you don't sound anti-Bitcoin at all—just thoughtful and curious about its bigger picture. Your point about Bitcoin being more than just a "buy and HODL" asset is spot on, and it’s refreshing to see someone wrestling with these ideas openly.If everyone who bought Bitcoin just locked it away in private wallets forever, the network would still function, but it’d be a pretty stagnant system. Bitcoin’s strength comes from its decentralization, security, and the fact that miners keep the network running by processing transactions. Miners get paid through block rewards (newly minted Bitcoin) and transaction fees. If no one’s moving Bitcoin on-chain—say, because everyone’s just HODLing—transaction volume drops, fees might not be enough to incentivize miners, and over time, that could weaken the network’s security. The block reward keeps halving every four years, so eventually, fees need to pick up the slack. Low activity could also make Bitcoin less appealing as a living, breathing system, which might hurt its value and adoption.Does that mean selling or moving Bitcoin on-chain is “bad”? Not at all. Moving Bitcoin—whether you’re selling, spending, or sending it—keeps the network active. Every transaction is a signal that Bitcoin’s being used, which helps miners and reinforces the network’s purpose. The catch is, reckless selling (like dumping huge amounts) can mess with price stability, which some folks worry could scare off new users. But regular movement? That’s Bitcoin doing what it’s meant to do.I hear you on wanting Bitcoin to be more than a store of value. Holding is great for long-term believers like you (and me, honestly—I’m stacking too), but Bitcoin’s real magic happens when it’s used. Imagine a world where people pay for coffee, send remittances, or settle contracts with Bitcoin seamlessly. That’s the dream Satoshi hinted at: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Right now, high fees and slow confirmation times on the base layer make small daily transactions tricky, but solutions like the Lightning Network are trying to fix that. Adoption’s growing in places like El Salvador, where folks are using Bitcoin for real-world stuff, and that’s the kind of utility you’re talking about.You’re not pessimistic—you’re idealistic, and that’s awesome. HODLing’s a strategy, not a religion. Bitcoin’s community sometimes gets stuck in the “number go up” mindset, but plenty of people share your vision. Look at devs building apps, merchants accepting BTC, or folks in hyperinflated economies using it to survive. They’re proving Bitcoin’s more than a digital gold bar.We can’t force utility overnight, though. It’ll take better tech, more education, and businesses taking a leap. Encouraging people to use Bitcoin—spending it, accepting it, building on it—while still holding some for the long haul could strike the balance you’re looking for. Maybe try spending a little BTC at a merchant that accepts it or check out Lightning wallets to see how it feels. That’s what I’ve been experimenting with, and it’s eye-opening.What do you think—any ideas on how we could push for more real-world use without losing the HODL ethos?

You’ve raised some really important and tough questions here. The timing of the attack—just before peace talks—definitely raises eyebrows and casts doubt on any sincere diplomatic efforts. It gives off the vibe that some players might not genuinely be interested in peace, or at least not on fair terms.

Geopolitics in the Middle East has always been a tangled web, and sadly, power struggles often unfold through proxy wars and carefully orchestrated escalations. If Israel acted with the U.S. in the loop or even with their backing, it sends a confusing message: advocating for peace while gearing up for conflict.

That said, it’s crucial to hold off until we have solid information. In high-stakes scenarios like this, misinformation and emotionally charged stories can spread like wildfire. No matter what the reality is, it’s the civilians and the stability of the region that end up bearing the brunt of it all.

Let’s keep our fingers crossed for transparency and genuine diplomacy—but it’s hard to overlook the patterns we’re seeing.

User: Bleaking6
Rank: Newbie

One standout example is Dogecoin (DOGE). Born in 2013 as a joke based on a Shiba Inu meme, Dogecoin was never meant to be serious. It chugged along with minimal value, often trading at fractions of a cent, and by 2018, many wrote it off as a relic of early crypto hype. Its market cap was under $100 million, and it looked like a ghost coin with no real use case or dev activity. Fast forward to 2020-2021, and DOGE shocked everyone. A mix of community fervor on Reddit (r/WallStreetBets), X posts, and Elon Musk’s relentless tweeting (“to the moon!”) sparked a frenzy. Developers started dusting off the code, pushing updates to improve transaction speed and lower fees. By May 2021, DOGE hit an all-time high of $0.74, a mind-blowing 29,000% surge from its 2020 low of $0.0025, with a market cap topping $90 billion. Even now, in 2025, it’s still kicking, trading around $0.20-$0.30 with active community support and devs exploring payment use cases. Posts on X still hype DOGE as a “people’s coin,” and its resilience comes from that grassroots energy plus Musk’s occasional nods.y.


 Any thoughts on these, or are you fishing for a more obscure gem? Also, what’s your take on why Terra/LUNA and FTT are beyond saving? Spill the tea! 😄

Dyno8050, we warned you this would happen. You thought defending them would earn you some protection or respect. But now Stake has turned on you, just like they’ve done to countless others.

Your ID worked fine for Rollbit, Roobet, Shuffle, and CSGORoll. Suddenly, for Stake, it’s “not genuine”? Permanent restriction. No real appeal. Just cold silence wrapped in legal terms.

They follow the same tired playbook. Lock the account, blame the KYC process, and ignore the user. All while operating in gray areas with shady payment methods, especially in countries like India where they hide behind third-party UPI vendors and skirt tax laws.

You thought you were safe. You weren’t. Stake’s not interested in fairness or transparency. They only care about control, power, and silencing anyone who pushes back.

I actually feel for you. Because now, you’re waking up to the same reality many others already know. Lost deposits. Blocked withdrawals. Frozen bank accounts. No accountability.

Your next move? Heading to Curaçao, lol? Good luck with that. Sure, they got their shiny new license — OGL/2024/1451/0918, active since June 9, 2025 — but we both know that’s not a shield for victims. It’s a permission slip for unchecked damage.

Dyno8050, you backed the wrong horse, and now it’s kicked you square in the face. “Kick + Icked”—ironic, isn’t it? Kick, Stake’s streaming platform, where you’ll probably head next, hoping Eddie’ll throw you a bone. Lol, good luck begging him to listen while he’s too busy counting his cash from rigging RTPs and dodging that India arrest warrant. You thought defending these frauds would save your ass, but here you are, another victim of their hypocrisy.

@holydarkness, You’re spinning my words into knots, cherry-picking what fits your script while dodging the real fight. I never said the FBI’s probing my missing monthly bonus—that’s your leap, not mine. Those bonuses? Just bait for high rollers like me, a Platinum III VIP who dumped $70,000 and $2,688 into Stake, only to get $6.57 when $30 was promised. Stake’s empire thrives on hooking losers, then mocking them on livestreams—something you conveniently sidestep.

My FBI complaint targets bigger fish—organized greed, not just my payout. I won’t spill the details or evidence; handing criminals the playbook is a rookie move, and I’ve seen enough fallout to know better. You want proof? Look at Stake’s mandatory KYC rollout—universal, sudden, paired with one-time bonuses to mop up years of sloppy, shady dealings. Pressure’s working, but don’t give me a pat on the back; they’re scrambling, not reforming.

New games and fixed originals? Sure, progress. But we need independent audits, transparent disclosures, and ironclad safeguards—not backroom tinkering. Instead, I get your deflection, your referee act between users and casinos. You’ve admitted you don’t gamble—never felt a six-figure loss or an account lockout with canned support replies. So maybe you’re less a voice of reason and more a curator of optics, not solutions.

Own it, and I’d respect the hustle. But playing neutral while sidelining victims? That’s damage control, not justice. Maybe launch “Holy’s Arbitration Service”—might outshine casino support. Until then, you’re part of this ecosystem, not above it. If you won’t back the real complaints, at least quit tripping up those of us shouting them.

Thanks. — KingBJ21 Still standing. Still loud. Your list can choke on it.

Dyno8050, you blubbering, Stake-sucking knobhead! 😆

Screeching “spam” and “brain rot” like a whiny little twat having a meltdown—real cute, you forum fucking trainwreck. All I see is you barfing up garbage while dodging that apology like the spineless shitgibbon you are.

I dropped $50,000 for you to prove I’m Black Jacky—where’s the proof, you witless fucknugget? Oh, right, you’re too busy chugging Eddie’s scam swill and shilling for Stake, even after they fucked your sorry ass. Mental help? Mate, you’re the one who needs a brain reboot, you half-baked cockwomble.

You don’t get to keep flapping your dumbass gob until you cough up that fucking apology for your bullshit accusations.

Too thick to write one? Brain too scrambled from Stake’s con piss? Grow some fucking nuts, admit you’re a lying, scam-slurping wankstain, or crawl back to Eddie’s lap like the gutless, two-faced prat you are. Shut your trap or get fucking roasted, Dyno. 😎