Just yesterday, a BAYC holder sold his NFT (once worth $400k) for only $37k. In less than three weeks, BAYC’s floor price fell from 14.5 ETH to 9 ETH — a sign of how far the NFT hype has cooled. Yet, at the same time, Ethereum Foundation launched “The Torch” NFT to mark its 10th anniversary, showing there’s still interest from major players.

We’re also seeing shifts in the NFT narrative:

Collectibles: Pokemon cards are gaining traction as a crypto crossover.

Art Integration: Projects like LiveArt (ticker $ART) are merging traditional art with NFTs, drawing attention from collectors and degens alike.


The ecosystem seems to be evolving rather than dying. But the big question is: will NFTs surge again in this bull cycle, or are they destined to remain a niche market?

With the recent buzz that DOGS is home to a staggering 42.2 million Telegram users, it’s clear that this could be one of the largest airdrops in the crypto space. But the big question remains: Will this airdrop truly incentivize the majority of holders?

As a DOGS holder, I’m sure you're eager to squeeze every bit of value out of your allocation, especially with exchanges likely to offer enticing giveaways to attract more users. The expectations were already high before the announcement of Binance Launchpool for this memecoin, but with the added "X" factor that this launch brings, those expectations have skyrocketed.

So, how can we, as holders, make the most of this opportunity now that it’s shaping up to be even bigger than anticipated?

A quick survey on Twitter shows that most holders are weighing their options, looking for exchanges with the best giveaway offers. So, where do you think the majority will flock to? Your insights could be invaluable, especially for newbies navigating this landscape!

Real World Assets (RWA) are quickly becoming one of the hottest narratives in crypto. By tokenizing traditionally illiquid assets like bonds, real estate, and even equities, blockchain has enabled a new ecosystem where global investors can gain exposure without the usual barriers.

A good example is Ondo Finance, which recently listed 100+ tokenized stocks across multiple exchanges and DeFi platforms, branding it as “Wall Street without the wall.” That sounded like a bold step forward for mainstream adoption.

Now the SEC has declared tokenized stocks as securities. History shows mixed outcomes with such rulings:

Bitcoin ETFs: SEC approval brought huge inflows and legitimacy (bullish).

ICOs (2017–18): Crackdowns wiped the market (bearish).

Stablecoins & XRP: Regulatory pressure slowed adoption and caused sell-offs.


For DeFi protocols like Maker, Aave, and Ondo that already integrate RWAs, this could go two ways:

Bullish: Clear rules attract institutions, boosting liquidity and legitimacy.

Bearish: Heavy compliance could push projects offshore and restrict retail access.

So, is this going to be bullish or bearish?

A quick look on Victorybit and I think that I still see some characteristic phrases used in AI-generated posts. However, this was only a quick glance I just did and I could be mistaken. On the one hand, I'd like to agree with you and provide a second chance, but on the other hand, there's no guarantee that they simply haven't "smartened up" and aren't using other ways to hide their posts from being detected, or won't do in the future after being accepted in a signature campaign.

American football in 2025 is buzzing with insane changes! Stars like Aaron Rodgers are switching teams, old-school vets are hanging up their cleats, and brand-new rules make the game even more thrilling. There's flashy new "Rivalries" uniforms from Nike, fancy virtual first-down markers, and stricter penalties for crazy celebrations. Plus, streaming just got way cooler with games popping up everywhere online. It's gonna be one wild ride—can't wait to see who's gonna dominate this season!

Hey everyone! It's been quite some time since my last post here. So much has happened in between. Regarding FreeBitco.in, I've attempted numerous times to hit a substantial jackpot, yet every attempt resulted in me receiving just the bare minimum payout. Despite these setbacks, I'm still hopeful that occasionally bigger wins do occur. Here's wishing you all luck and hoping one day you'll land an impressive haul too!

I don't see anything out of the ordinary in any of the two users. The posts aren't anything great, but at least it seems that they aren't using AI, perhaps they could be given another chance

That's what I've also said, no actual person uses it on an average forum. If I'm honest, I don't even know how to type it on the keyboard myself, except for the regular hyphen (-). However, in many cases it's inconclusive to make the assumption that it's AI, because as I've also mentioned in a previous reply, the dash is often used by grammar correctors such as Grammarly or Quillbot. Thus, even though it does look suspicious, it's not necessarily a red flag, it depends on the user, their posting history, habits etc.

Actually, they do. I understand what you're saying, even older members who have great knowledge of English, or even are English speaking as their native language don't use the hyphen symbol. I'm not sure about Grammarly, but Quilbot 100% does, and I know because I sometimes use it if something doesn't sound right. Also, Quillbot has integrated AI functions that can fully change your text to improve fluency, or even continue writing for you, it's not a simple grammar correction tool, it depends on how you decide to use it. If you use it to fix a few mistakes, that's okay, if you're using it to completely change the meaning, then you're at fault.

If an user is that lazy to not even edit out the bad hyphen out of the post what percentage of the post can you expect to be genuine and written by them?

what do you mean it's not part of a normal keyboard layout?
you can't just accuse me of using AI because the rest of you are too lazy to press ALT + 0151 on your keyboard to write with correct grammars

Here's an example of a post that makes heavy use of the em dash. None of the detectors flagged this post as being written by an AI or even edited using a humanizer. It's a dash that was added as a result of using a grammar correction in one of the proofreading programs. So, relying on this as a sign that a person is using an AI doesn't make any sense to me.

If they do rewrite the whole sentence structure, then it is no longer grammar correction. You are just using grammar correction tools to write the post for you. It is not your content even if you started the process by inputting something written by you. Ironically, it is much more honest to write using broken English and it is much better for the person to practice English this way. Spelling correction tools are useful, more than that is not needed and is often counterproductive.