Where does it say that if you think a deal with a user is high risk but he already has two feedbacks he doesn't need any more?
In my post

Seriously though, it's up to any potential trade partner to make apply their own judgement of the feedback on an account. I used neutral so it's a warning without harsh consequences. That may change in the future, but I wouldn't be surprised if Ratimov doesn't return.
I completely disagree with this. Feedback have a date and for me if someone had a successful trade with Ratimov in the past he should not delete what he wrote, simply if he thinks he is high risk now he should add negative feedback as of today.
I'd say: "it depends". User yogg went from
+32 =0 -0 a year ago to
# +13 =0 -43 now. This means the majority of DT removed their positive feedback.
On the other hand, there's
this account, where RHavar left positive feedback in 2016, and negative feedback in 2019. This way, it shows a timeline of events and going from trusted to untrusted.
You are asking others to do what you do not want to do: to enhance the danger of trading risk. You prefer it to be enhanced by deleting old positive feedback instead of adding current negative feedback.
It's more that I don't think the old feedback still applies.
I guess we agree to disagree on this.
Agreed

I love democracy
