It’s not at all possible for Bitcoins to completely take over the fiat. The reason is very simple. Bitcoins are limited in numbers. Hence majority of the people consider it as a digital asset rather than any currency. Moreover due to the decentralised nature of the coin, it cannot be controlled, hence government will impose the traditional banking methods only. Moreover we are also in very early stage to think something like this. Let’s practically see things and let’s progress slowly.

I agree with your point of view on Bitcoin's regulation, or lack thereof, by governments. This brings up an important point about cryptocurrencies: they are not connected to standard financial systems. For countries like Bangladesh, this freedom is especially hard to handle, even though it sounds desirable. Its interesting that people are still using Bitcoin even though its been banned. Wonderful human

I can relate to what you said about people in less developed places. Education could make a big difference. Imagine that it were easier for people in Bangladesh to find information about cryptocurrencies. Informed decision-making could be improved by giving people more power. Money laundering and other problems with administration are real risks, but they also create chances for new rules to be made. Could Bangladesh create a new set of rules that recognizes Bitcoin's promise while also keeping it from being abused? Its possible that this method could lead to a more balanced and open-minded mindset about cryptocurrencies.

Cryptocurrency is now getting acceptable and those who don't know yet will surely go towards learning about its characteristic because it is a reality that whenever new things come into use then people first start investigating about it then use their money for investment.

Those were the people of past were innocent who don't understand well but put money into anything but now age is modern and also people are modified according to era so they will not think bitcoin as a curse but they will realize its benefits. Like you have seen that instead of having strict regulations in some country people are still buying more and more bitcoin because they know that a day will come when their country will accept bitcoin so I think that it is will of everyone to be educated about bitcoin as they already know that importance of bitcoin.

That was a mistake by me and after knowing about it I corrected my saying here
It was my typing mistake I was talking about bitcoin you can check further sentence, there I talked about "bitcoin, not "crypto".

Everything has a purpose the more people realize this the better. Most people who are hurt by the banking system and others who are involved the crypto world (especially here in the forum) has now over evaluated the presence of Bitcoin and/or shitcoins that they do not need this third parties, most for a selfish reason of not paying there dues for storing their money or should I say assets since it's not only money that is stored in the banks others especially the ones exposed to decentralization and/or involved in Bitcointalk (Bitcoin and shitcoins) are not even in reality not interested in third parties but just to build up the hype here in the forum as lovers of Bitcoin to get credits while in reality they patronize third parties more.  They don't realize the fact that some third-party will be needed one way or the other although it may not be banks but some kind of bank related services will be very much needed weather of the individual or institution.

If there will be some kind of bank that adopts Bitcoin I wonder how they will operate but the operation mode shouldn't be what thinking about cuz for everything has time accorded to it. when the time comes for firms that will operate with Bitcoin and or crypto in general there will surely be a way figured out.

when credit unions where created it some maybe started contradicting the aims of governments so inorder to still bring back their strong hold the corrupt banking system rules are being pushed to them to bring the power of control in. at these point most of the credit unions that are not strong enough to resist will have to partake inorder to remain valid.

Most times when ordinary citizens are cut up in this corrupt banking system they rather not speak because of the social status believing no matter how hard they try they voices can't be heard. Even when their banks aren't serving them they tend to remain shut than waste their time lamenting. when banks adapt to the paradigm then people will have option to either move their assets when their banks are not serving them as needed.

Since we don't know about the future we only speculate so for the current time being or in the nearest future (decades and/or more) co-existence might still be the situation but when a complete revolution may occur the faith of fiat might be less base on personal overview of the future. With what I have seen in the growth of tech money for children and the rest of it will not be a problem, from my observation comparing the past and the present then the present and the future it will surely be a different thing all the way in the future. If you want to truly see from my point of view watch some revolutionary movies and see how the future might look like and then search for movies from the late 80s and 90s that talks about this current stage we are now and you will be amazed to see that most of the revolutions are now happening or has happened already.
In a not shell Bitcoin dominance is still a speculate and/or prediction no one know the future.

I apparently observed that what he or she was talking about is situated now (current/present day) and not the future while you capitalized in future so the misunderstanding is from future and now. currently some people can't use the ATM machines and that's not because they're not educated or illiterate but because most where not brought up from tech exposed society or villages so it still hard for the to comprehend the paradigm. but for tech and/or civilized societies using this techs might be convenient enough cuz but kids are literally in used o modern tools.

Nigeria is of one the top countries in Africa that has the highest number of users of Bitcoin technology or Blockchain tech, the governments of nigeria may or may not be investing in Bitcoin your thoughts are mere assumption. your assumption that Nigeria politicians use Bitcoin to move the money laundered has to evidence or solid fact but although we all know how corrupt the Nigeria government is but doesn't warrant your conclusion that Bitcoin is their source of moving money laundered. 

I think majority know this that it was due and bound to happen and we all have Satoshi to thank for the brilliant idea. Bitcoin in it's original core like you said was meant to aid the whole system of central control of the public funds and help evaluate the idea of financial purpose and indeed it has and like every good project more idea and use always comes with it and this has also been the case of Bitcoin itself as the use of Bitcoin has been greatly diverse into an investment purpose and this has made Bitcoin superb in it's adoption. Bitcoin is an evolution in working progress and it will take some time to actually overtake the whole Rocker fellers central bank system but even if it doesn't really meet that goal, it's still very beneficial and one thing about evolution, it's doesn't really happen overnight.

In reference to bitcoin as a paradigm shifting technology, you (Churchillvv) are not wrong about anything that you seem to be saying, but it might be helpful to try to flesh out what you are saying a bit better, but surely you are on the right track.. and maybe talking about paradigm shifting cannot completely capture all of the special things about bitcoin, but it surely puts bitcoin in a category that is quite difficult to proclaim any of the shitcoins are fitting into a similar kind of category.

So for example ethereum and some of the other supposedly high market cap coins like to compare themselves to bitcoin as if they were similar to bitcoin (but different in some interesting ways.. blah blah blah) or they are better in better than bitcoin because of x, y or z reasons, and even though an overwhelming majority of them are distracting scams because they are frequently trying to print money and enrich the founders rather than really serving any meaningful purpose, and perhaps some of them do find some interesting and potentially meaningful purposes, such as Ethereum and some ofthe ethereum imitators abilities to empower people in the somewhat more user-friendly ways of writing, developing and promoting software that is largely just meant to enrich the founders rather than either providing some kind of service or being genuine in their claims of what they are going to do in the future. 

These various shitcoins and projects can still out-perform bitcoin for various short periods of time, and could even have very extended periods of outperforming bitcoin and maybe some of what they might be doing would be to attempt to support status quo systems and to undermine bitcoin, while stating that they are doing other supposedly good-for-society types lf things, but they may well be just being used to attack the robustness of bitcoin.

So, a paradigm-shifting technology, such as bitcoin, ended up radically transforming the ways in which we can both communicate information, and to be able to attach monetary value upon such information (whether it is transmitted or just held in storage), and even though several POW coins were attempting to replicate various aspects of bitcoin, they still would need to attract mining power to go over to them, so earlier in bitcoin's growth, it was likely more vulnerable to potential diversions of mining power and resources over to some other POW coin, and at the same time, bitcoin is not completely immuned to such attacks to split the network and to confuse incentives in regards to which is the "real bitcoin," or which of the forks will end up winning the sound money proposition - if there is a kind of assumption that it is difficult to maintain two, unless they might be very close to equal... which did not seem to be the case in the block-size wars of 2017 and even a variety of potentially competing forks that so far all ended up failing pretty spectacularly, even though it took a few years for a couple of the greater competitors of Bcash (BCH) and Bcash SV (BSV) to really show themselves as almost completely worthless, even though they still exist as kind of zombie coins that hope to someday recover like a phoenix from the ashes, and they are currently sold/marketed to the public as potential insurance against BTC's failure and sometimes get funding based on their ongoing claims of being "the real bitcoin."  So, sure there can be several ways of potentially dividing ideas and perceptions of what bitcoin is and where its value lies, that may cause some folks to hedge or even to pursue shitcoins that are proof of stake or even forks of BTC (which could also happen again in the future).

In essence the various shitcoins have not shifted any paradigm in any way that is even close to as meaningful that bitcoin has brought to the world, and likely for any kind of new technology to displace any incumbent, it has to be around 10x or more better than any of its competitors, and bitcoin has a lot of use cases that currently show that it is likely more than 10x better than many existing technologies, whether we are referring to how value is transmitted (internationally or even locally), storage of value like gold, fiat money that robs from the people based on it not really being pegged to anything in any strict way, except for some of the whims that politicians or financial folks or status quo rich folks want to either preserve themselves in the system or to prevent great corrections that are healthy for the system, but then if the corruption of continuing to print the money exists, it gets more and more difficult to allow a real and meaningful correction to play out. 

There are several other ways that bitcoin provides great empowerment to the system - and even a kind of parrallel system, and even though bitcoin is paradigm-shifting, it is not guaranteed to succeed, so in those kinds of regards it is likely better to stay invested in both systems, and surely if you really feel that you understand bitcoin, you might overly invest into the bitcoin system, but you don't necessarily want to overly invest into bitcoin in such a hard way that you are not able to survive if some things happen in which bitcoin has heavily, intensive and long correction periods and if you have not prepared yourself for a variety of situations, and a lot of the preparations are likely related to both you position size and making sure to have a decent amount of your bitcoin value in private locations that are completely in your control and/or shared custody with people who you trust not to screw you over..

..and you do not have to have all your private coins in one location, because even if you have given information to family members about how to get at your coins, you might choose to make some of those systems unable to breach absent your death and/or incapacitation.. which surely those kinds of protections are frequently easier said than done... but bitcoin systems are still building and evolving and likely any of us who are building our bitcoin stashes, we need to ongoingly spending some time to watch developments and make sure that our systems of private storage are sufficiently robust, and maybe even 10x to 100x more robust than seemingly necessary since sometimes the BTC price might shoot up by a lot all at once, and maybe someone who might have had 21 BTC on his/her phone (or some other hotwallet) in 2015 (which would have had a value of $5,250 - based on a then price per coin of $250),. but then by the end of 2017, those same 21 Bitcoins would have been worth close to $413k - based on a then price per coin of $19,666). And sure, that was a large and fast increase in value that could have had caused some of the HODLers holding their coins in places less secure than they should have had been, and also some of the coins might have also been held with 3rd parties which is not safe to have all your coins in such third party custody, even though you might decide to keep up to 30% or 40% of your coins with 3rd party custody.. and so each person has to decide those 3rd party custody matters, including how many people either got robbed of their coins or their coins were frozen for long periods of time, whether we are referring to MTGOX in 2014, or the various failures of several third parties in 2022 and perhaps continuing... including but not limited to Terra/Luna, Celsius, Voyager, BlockFi, 3AC, FTX, Gemini earn, Genesis, and Grayscale (BGTC).   

The banking system has disappointed people in many ways. In the last economic crisis, the banks were bailed out with taxpayer money, and we were left with that money. This is unfair, and it shows that banks do not value people. We gave them a chance, but they abused our trust. It's time to let them take care of themselves. We will not forget what they did, and we will not give them a second chance.

Sometimes wanting to introduce bitcoin, systems, concepts to lay people is still difficult and they almost don't believe the concept after it is explained. I told my friends the same age as my parents, that they believed from the start that they only knew fiat money. only young people believe because the version of the modern world has changed. Until now, young people in my area can get to know bitcoin and crypto