He's kinda lost his sting of pumping DOGE and BTC in the last few months. D.O.G.E. department jokes hardly moved the tickers up when they were tweeted.

It must mean he can't carry the crypto market (alone) anymore.

Well it wouldn't surprise me, as this doesn't seem like a time when normal people would want to buy crypto anyway.

DOGE is almost certainly nowhere near $1 anymore though.

I did not watch or listen to Ron DeSantis' speeches but I read that he used to be considered as a most promising replacement for Donald Trump in the Republic Party. Then he failed to compete directly with Trump for a nominee position of his party. To be honest, I did not know about JD Vance and his speeches too but I only began to know about him, watch his interviews after he was chosen by Trump as a Vice President Nominee of Republic Party and I watched more videos of his speeches last two weeks.

I can not compare Vance and DeSantis because as said, I only watched Vance's interviews but I am impressed with this young politician and he has a successful career from academic to business too.

If you want to know, ask the people who don't want him to be president. Do you think his assassination attempts were staged plays? If it were you, would you dare stand still and let someone aim straight at your head and shoot from a distance of 120-140m? Even if it was the best sniper the US military had, let alone a regular person with little experience using a gun.

I have seen many people talking about this theory and I can only advise them: they should watch less Marvel or DC movies, watch less action movies and not be naive enough to think that what is in the movies can also be applied to our real lives.

So you think trump winning would be bullish for crypto?

like covid-19 which is almost similar to what Thanos did on the avenger "Infinity Stones", I think the movie is good implemented to the real life if happen too to Trumph. Yes, it is possible that this could happen with certain scenarios to make people sympathize with him. But if this is true happens, he can use this "opportunity" to make him as sacrifice. He can playing victim to to attract people's sympathy for him. This has happened in my country, how SBY did on 2014 when Megawati call him a "childish general", SBY famous has grown up after that because Indonesia people consider him as a victim, and attract everyone's sympathy to him.

Lulz. I'm not sure if you noticed but the United States has a Democrat in office and has for the last 4 years. Did all the wealthy elites move and take their money overseas?  Did bitcoin die?  Where is that money going to go when overseas?   The US elites care about tax breaks for themselves and their Corps, but if you think they care enough about their crypto holdings to move overseas, I think you are gravely overestimating what's at hand.  

Let's be clear, Cryptocurrency as a whole and Bitcoin are two very different things.  99% of cryptocurrency coins/tokes/ventures are utter nonsense and or scams.  Including DeFi, which I've yet to see one legitimate DeFi project, personally.  World Liberty Financial which is just little more than a theory at this point, is said to be a DeFi exchange, as well as having plans to launch their own DeFi token.  What's that have to do with bitcoin?

Trump in a recent lives-stream said "“Barron knows so much about this, Barron’s a young guy, but he knows,” said the proud father. “He talks about his wallet, he’s got four wallets or something, and I’ll say ‘what is a wallet?’”

Trump has called bitcoin a scam and "based on thin air", in the past, and only recently changed his tune when he a) found out he could sell NFTs which cost him virtually nothing for a nice profit  b) found out it would help garner him votes.  

Trump doesn't have a clue what bitcoin even is, and while I do commend him for being open to new technologies, I highly doubt he'd have an interest if it didn't profit him directly.  The same goes for most in the "upper" tiers of finance. I would know as I work in finance and have been touting bitcoin for it's technological breakthroughs since 2014ish when hardly anyone I worked with, at the time at a Fortune 500 financial firm, knew what it was and were quick to call it a scam and laugh me off when trying to get them to "just take a look at it".  Now they all are because taking a look involves profiting, not the excitement I had when I first learned of bitcoin and how it could help me in my "crusade" against big banks and financial corruption.

We all know crypto was riding along smoothy during Trump's first term. It was Joe Biden and his administration that took the industry downhill. The SEC had several crackdowns on crypto exchanges during the Biden administration (the one we are currently in). The Binance fiasco, Bittrex leaving the US, etc. was Democrats' fault. We didn't see any of that when Trump was President. Kammie is part of the current administration, so don't expect her to be any better IF she wins the election (that's a big "IF").

Trump is now more open to crypto/Blockchain tech by attending conferences, launching its own Blockchain (WLFI), and even using it for daily payments (like buying burgers with BTC at a NYC bar). He's even against CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies). The VP nominee J.D. Vance is a well-known Bitcoin investor. A Trump win would be a "yuge" win for the crypto industry in America. It's very likely Bitcoin will soar past the $100k mark. The US must stay ahead of the crypto game. We can't let China or Russia get away with it. Right?

Yes, bitcoin is not only concentrated in the United States, bitcoin is present everywhere in the world. But you forget one thing, they are the world superpower and most of the world economy depends on them let alone our little crypto industry.

Most other countries in the world look at what they do and use that as a benchmark, so if they actually use bitcoin as a payment method, you will see a bunch of their countries and allies doing the same and vice versa. Take USD for example, they can make USD the official currency in international trade, so if they want bitcoin to become popular worldwide, it is not too difficult for them.

Not to mention which organizations and where are holding large amounts of bitcoin? Most are in the US like Tesla, BlackRock, Microstrategy...Bitcoin ETFs are also in the US.

The election results as well as US policies and regulations will directly impact the crypto industry, there is no denying that.

I think $125k by the end of this year is in the realm of possibilities, of course only if Trump wins. If QueMala wins, bitcoin will go into a short bear market first and only then it will go above $100k. That bear market won't last more than a year but still though, it will delay lots of people's plans. So, Trump should be the choice of the voters if you want to get rich quicker.

The USD will fail anyway and Trump sees it better than anyone. That's why his tone towards bitcoin changed recently. He knows the USD is about to die.

I also wish what you said was true, do you have any proof that Harris said she supports crypto? As far as I know, not long ago, some members of the Democratic Party took the initiative to form a group called Crypto4Harris with the aim of attracting cryptocurrency users to support her. But did you know that she refused to join that campaign and has so far ignored the group's efforts to help her connect with the crypto community? It seems that not only does she not care about cryptocurrencies, but she also has some disdain and contempt for crypto investors and the crypto industry. As for Gary, everyone has seen what he has done with crypto and I think you don't need to say anything more about him and don't need to prove anything more.

Yes, bitcoin is fine under Biden and is fine even if Harris wins but it would be better if Trump wins. Between fine and better, I wouldn't choose fine like you.