Maybe it is me, not speaking English as a mother tongue language, who fuelled the misconception.
In a fully decentralised approach, I will abide by events and wont remove or frown upon messages regarding obscure corporations claiming Bitcoin Reserves, whether they are strategic or not.
In the real sense, do individuals and private entities even have a reserve? It's nations/states that own reserves. What individuals and private entities have are assets.
Yes they do have a Reserve.
Reserves are assets set aside for specific obligations.
It can also be recorded as a liability in the balance sheet as in the case of Bank reserves.
In my mind, a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve is reserved for nation-states.
As a Strategic reserve in Gold.
Like I said above I don't really think it's limited in just being a thing for nations state.
It applies to any entity preparing for scarcity, disruption, or strategic need. For example, a hospital might keep a reserve of critical medical supplies
or a hedge fund could hold a reserve of cash for market crashes.
Gold was held by the Government for economic stability; strategic needs.
Bitcoin can be held by individuals and institutions as a reserve to prepare against inflation and infinite supply of Fiat.