What it would change in Bitcoin itself other than to bring more prestige and just be news for the people to discuss.
And a bit of a bullish sentiment would flow from that.

Feels like it is going to take a while though, too many people are waiting for this to happen right away, but you have to understand that it is not going to be something that happens right away, it is something that will take a while and that's why it matters so much. I feel like it is going to be a hard job, and we need to make it work one way or another, and that's why I think we need to focus on the fact that it is not really that big of a deal, so we need to be careful.

I believe we are going to see this changing soon, bitcoin will close the gap more, but that should take years, maybe over a decade, maybe even more than two decades, so this isn't something that's quick, we can't make that work that easily, we need to be careful.

My view is simple.. If OP asks that, I think OP already knows what the most appropriate answer is, but at least by asking that, OP will get a lot of additional insight, what and how BTC's performance and potential will be in the future. Now, it's back to us, which one is more interesting and profitable for us to invest in the long term.

I don't know, i don't see it as a prestige thing but a convenience thing
gold is a good way to store money without it being eaten up by inflation due to the wild printing of fiat money
but it is inconvenient, dangerous, difficult to store and transport
bitcoin surpasses it in this; of course is my opinion

If you want to invest in future, then you have to invest in Bitcoin. Just have a look what has happened, at first we were exchanging things with each other, then we moved on silver and gold coins, then on papers, then on fiat and later, in 2008, an innovation by Satoshi Nakamoto has happened.
Gold is widely utilized compared to Bitcoin because Gold is one of the earliest currency. It's almost the most stable because of its past. For centuries, everyone has been using it as a value of wealth.

I am not 100% sure whether Bitcoin will surpass gold or not but I'm sure that the future belongs to technologies. Bitcoin is a technology, a digital one and future belongs to it.

During the year 2021, bitcoin reached the $1 trillion market cap. During the same time period, the market cap of gold was $11 trillion. At present the market cap of bitcoin is around $2 trillion, whereas the market cap of gold is $18 trillion. What a huge difference between the two. For bitcoin there is an increase of $1 trillion, whereas with gold the increase is $7 trillion. This shows that people are much more connected with traditional investment. The growth happens when the awareness along with the real-time usage increases all around the world.

To surpass gold isn't an easy thing. Maybe this can happen in the future. People consider gold as a risk-free investment, which means even the person who says, I'll go completely with bitcoin investment, will have at least a small percentage in gold investment if his portfolio is examined.

Govs and corpos do already see and make things in that direction - so yeah.
Not much is needed to be changed for that view of Bitcoin to stick in the years to come by any party.

Well when you talk about Gold and Bitcoin there is always an argument and one of many argument is Gold is been here for thousand of year while bitcoin just here like a decade or so and not all people gonna believe in bitcoin.

But things are about to change because now big institutions have started to buy Bitcoin big company and even a country start to buy bitcoin

back to your question can bitcoin surpass gold I dont know maybe someday


Which team do you fall into Digital Gold or Traditional Gold? Im both team

I think that this is an easy question to answer, and I am surprised that more do not answer it this way:

Gold is still the center of gravity in the world's financial and banking system. Gold is what will be used to recapitalize the system if and when it fails because gold is the only asset on central bank balance sheets that is not someone else's liability. This is the reason why European countries had to contribute gold during the formation of the Euro, and why they contirbuted in proportion to the relative sizes of their economies. Now if you look at the current dollar price of the world's gold, compared to all the existing debt, the current price of gold is miniscule. If the system needs to be rebooted, gold will be revalued overnight (or during the two week banking holiday), and when markets reopen, the purchasing power of gold will be 10x or 20x or 50x higher than it is today. This is why central banks hold gold, and a big reason why non-USD aligned countries continue to purchase gold and take possession of it. Bitcoiners should not underestimate the power of TPTB to use gold to reboot the system. There are good reasons to use gold as the fulcrum: The fact that it is held in relative proportion to the size of each economy can be a stabilizing factor during a time that will be tumultuous over the short term. That might actually help to prevent a major world war. Don't rule out the possibility of a Bretton Woods style conference if the system freezes up. But even in the absence of some coordinated action, the fact that gold is already on those balance sheets makes it the default mechanism for recapitalization. Remember this: You do not hold gold expecting a bitcoin-style bull market. You hold gold waiting for the eventual one-time overnight revaluation, which can only happen when the system freezes up. For this reason, comparing the recent performance of gold compared to bitcoin completely misses the reason to hold gold.

Bitcoin will overtake gold in the long run. If the game theory plays out, then all countries will be forced to acquire it, just as they already possess gold. But there are great risks, destabilizing risks, if the system tries to recapitalize against bitcoin, rather than gold, in the short term. The fact that some countries may move before others increases the risk of armed conflict if bitcoin becomes the new fulcrum in the recapitalization of the world's financial system. While it is possible to imagine a Bretton Woods type conference to coordinate a reboot by revaluing gold, at the present time it is inconceivable to imagine such a Bretton Woods type conference to agree on bitcoin as the new anchor.  This is why I think there will be a major revaluation of gold as an intermediate event, though bitcoin may win out in the long run.

For this reason I think it is foolish to try to pick one over the other, and the only sensible decision is to hold both. The difficulty is in selecting the right proportion, which will be different depending on one's circumstances.