My bad, here you go!


Shoulda, woulda, coulda been piling shorts on them since 12:28 PM · May 22, 2025 CST


"What goes up, must come down."

What else in the universe doesn't abide by this law?

Saylors claim to fame is being a big loser, but he's a big loser with big boats... so he isn't playing in terrible games to "lose" in.

I agree.

Although, it's probably in the interest of the shareholders of Strategy, no?

OR, they could probably borrow against the company to buy MSTR stock because it's in a discount against NAV?


He is a CHAD for doing the way he invests in Bitcoin, but fighting "for us"? The PLEBS? Laughable. He's merely buying Bitcoin for the company as an investment.


I'm not sure what their corporate structure is, but it won't be the first time that a founder of a company has been fired by the board of his own company.

 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@kryptqnick. I agree that Microstrategy will certainly win this case in court, however, I disagree that this case will go to court. I predict that this will go into settlement where the complainants might receive money. Also, a settlement will certainly be the most inexpensive choice for Michael Saylor and a profitable outcome for the complainants hehehe.

The suing investors probably never heard about DYOR or they didn't take it seriously, the lawsuit is just to seek attention nothing more, I doubt that Michael Saylor, and Microstrategy, will lose sleep over the lawsuit. Let me liken this to newbies that rushes into crypto trading because they heard that somebody made a fortune in profit and without having adequate knowledge about the market they will lose all their money then blame everybody else but themselves. If these investors bought Bitcoin that means that they are in luck because sooner or later they will be profitable but if it's on shitcoins, suing Michael Saylor, will not bring their money back.

 

Ser, get the actual point of my post. What I said was if MSTR is at a discount against NAV, then it's probably a good investment decision to sell the asset - Bitcoin, to buy the stock and put NAV at par.

I also said, OR it's probably a good move to borrow against MSTR to buy MORE MSTR because its market value is lower against the book-value.

It's mere fundamentals ser.

I never made a post about "winning or losing"?

 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


If he is a sort of "god" to you, then OK. You do you.

Lawsuits get filed all the time that lead to nowhere. This should not be news.

Seems someone is a bit envious. You can argue on its after you do more for Bitcoin than he has. 

It is not important at all what this investor thinks as his reasons are baseless, you can file a suit at Strategy too and it will lead you nowhere.

Sure, but when was this not the case? Do you ever remember a time when media was not predominantly reporting negative news about Bitcoin? You can ignore some short exceptions if they occurred, due to positive sentiment and bull market. I think this is just mostly a continuation of the same, but using a different target. In this case they are using Strategy to continue with their fud.

This is not newsworthy either, because it is a non event. There is no guarantee that same actions will lead to the same consequences. If it was guaranteed, then each company could get very rich by simply following Strategy's strategy  . Of course it can't work that way. While it is likely to have a positive impact overall or over the long term, it may not work out so good for some in the short term. I'll give one example. As soon as Microstrategy started buying Bitcoin massively, it was clear that their path was set in stone but he probably made it clear even a bit before that. Because of that, people who held these shares already implicitly accepted this and were likely to continue holding it.

Now, you can't just take any company from a random industry where shareholders may not know anything about Bitcoin or even like Bitcoin and then except them to agree with it. Of course some will sell, and nobody can say in advance what the impact will be on each company.  

Hmm? Saylor is being vocal about investing on Bitcoin for how many years and now this what happens? I think they should've done research first before hopping on strategy, they should've trusted in the first place, and I bet these people are those traditional ones that complains regarding about the volatility of Bitcoin.

Typical fomo peeps, they just saw the hype and potential profits, but ignored the risks and volatility that come with his aggressive strategy. Then when the prices are not moving the way they wanted, they're suing? Also, I don't get it since Bitcoin is pretty going up high right now so why are they like that?