Sure, but when was this not the case? Do you ever remember a time when media was not predominantly reporting negative news about Bitcoin? You can ignore some short exceptions if they occurred, due to positive sentiment and bull market. I think this is just mostly a continuation of the same, but using a different target. In this case they are using Strategy to continue with their fud.

This is not newsworthy either, because it is a non event. There is no guarantee that same actions will lead to the same consequences. If it was guaranteed, then each company could get very rich by simply following Strategy's strategy  . Of course it can't work that way. While it is likely to have a positive impact overall or over the long term, it may not work out so good for some in the short term. I'll give one example. As soon as Microstrategy started buying Bitcoin massively, it was clear that their path was set in stone but he probably made it clear even a bit before that. Because of that, people who held these shares already implicitly accepted this and were likely to continue holding it.

Now, you can't just take any company from a random industry where shareholders may not know anything about Bitcoin or even like Bitcoin and then except them to agree with it. Of course some will sell, and nobody can say in advance what the impact will be on each company.