Like you said, a lot of people are going into Bitcoin just to make profit while they don't care about decentralization but the question is, how can this problem be solved?
Why are people, a lot of people giving kudos to the government as if they are the light of Bitcoin? This is something I have witnessed from a lot of people, giving regards to the government for the success of Bitcoin and I don't understand why, meanwhile it's still this same government that doesn't want decentralization, it's this government that are banning every platform that is used to promote more privacy of Bitcoin, platform such as mixers or exchanges that failed to comply with KYC protocols. If anything goes sideways now, a lot of the people will lose their coins or privacy to the government because they don't even care about it.  But those that still have a perfect knowledge will abide by no KYC and decentralized adoption methods.

You underestimate the government to what extent they can go and what they can do. Currently, they have great influence in pushing a narrative on how they want institutional investors to interact with Bitcoin. They are also now fully involved in acquiring and holding larger portions of Bitcoin.

You talk about how they can influence the price to go up, but their power doesn't just stop there. They can also, without stress, control and manipulate the market to react positively, and what you call a win-win for all will affect few.

That's about price, but on a serious note, the government, as I see it, is interested in making a profit from Bitcoin, but that's not their major concern, especially the US government.

They don't like what they can't control, and Bitcoin's censorship resistance is what they don't like and have been pushing the narrative of looking for a way to make censorship possible.

If everyone is quiet and focuses only on what they are doing with price, it will get to a time where they will have to decide for miners situated in their land what to process and what not to process, and when it gets to that point, is Bitcoin still considered to be completely decentralized?

This has to happen at some point because anything that is going so good attract attention of everyone. Initially Bitcoin was ignored by government and centralised institutes but seeing it's popularity everyone is now jumping in to get there share. I don't think the interference of centralised institutes will lesson with time now because price of Bitcoin has gone up enormously and nobody wants to miss the big share. 

Others provided links and I'd say MARA pool is the most well known case of such censorship since they celebrated it themselves in their own announcement! I've also been talking about it a lot in various topics; maybe you are right and I should have done more to increase awareness.
I started a topic last year to share some thoughts about traces of centralization in general (not just in mining): https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5494280.0

Hard facts but they are the truth, and we must acknowledge them for what they are. Yes, all most people care about is price increases, regardless of decentralization, and all governments care about is eliminating decentralization in some way.

I don't think governments will ever truly accept decentralization. Governments that failed to ban Bitcoin are trying to contain its core features (decentralization and privacy) by imposing regulations on third-party services (KYC, AML, etc.), which undermine decentralization and privacy.

Satoshi did a good job of hiding his identity so that governments wouldn't force him to do what he didn't want. Developers would also do well to do the same thing Satoshi did in preserving their privacy.

CEXes are not for that, they only want everything that is regulated and not as free and private as Monero.

More interest from bigger entities - their bigger part in the space, but it's okay, as long as the core principles of BTC are okay.

It's to control what can be done from their side - mostly. The good part is what you described - nonsavvy people would have all the resources to be helped up initially, but, clearly, they would be able to do the same by themselves, if only there were enough passion for it..

Actually, centralization is having its way because The entities that tries to centralize bitcoin is closer to the masses adopting it. Centralized platforms are always taking their marketing seriously while decentralized platforms have no visibility at all, so the masses goes with what they know and what they see constantly. TBH most people and institutions that buys bitcoin does so for the profits sake and care really less about decentralization.

Maybe more enlightenment channels should be introduced to keep more people in the know about the importance of privacy and decentralization in bitcoin, else the next decade might be a lot messier and FYI we are loosing the battle against centralization gradually.

Using ignored in the sentence eased the tension of the situation, Bitcoin was hated by the government with sanctions. I remembered when my country lifted the ban on Bitcoin (Cryptocurrency), they did not place the ban directly to Bitcoin, but it was applied towards financial institutions dealing with Bitcoin, if these bodies do not function, how do we pass through our P2P service without getting our money confiscated.

Bitcoin was created as an alternative to banks, which is controlled by the government, If it is not part of the plans, how do they come close to adopting Bitcoin when it initially supposed to be against them. It's hard to trust the government, they no longer creep centralization they jump into it, i fear because the government are whales and we know how fast whales can affect the market.