This is why I always laugh when I see coins with a high market cap, because when you look at their supply, you'd see that there are hundreds of billions and trillions in supply. How can something that is not scarce have any value?
Because of speculators, marketing, manufactured hype, and who knows what all else?
But I'm not quite understanding the logic, OP. If you lump bitcoin into the set that contains all cryptocurrencies, it's nothing special if you compare it to another coin with a fixed (and preferably similar) supply. If you look at the cryptocurrency space as "there's bitcoin
and the thousands of shitcoins that have been shat out over the years" then your argument makes sense, but I just don't see it that way.
Don't crucify me here, because I'm a huge fan of bitcoin and am not slamming it by any means, but the only thing that's really special about it is that it was first. It actually performs worse than a lot of other shitcoins in terms of network fees, privacy, and likely a few more attributes that aren't coming to mind immediately. If I have to buy something with crypto, there's no way I'm going to use bitcoin.
Anyway, I'd say any shitcoin with a fixed supply is "scarce" if you're going to slap that label on bitcoin. One bitcoin can be divided up to the eighth decimal place, so that term might need to be defined more precisely if this is going to be argued.
In terms of scarcity, bitcoin is the only true scarce coin;
In terms of decentralization, bitcoin is the only coin that is 100% decentralized;
In terms of security, bitcoin is the most secured coin;
In terms of acceptability; bitcoin is the most accepted coin.
So, bitcoin is the king.
You are making assertions without providing any evidence, and the conclusion you came to--that bitcoin is kind--wasn't OP's argument anyhow.
Normally I'd just read a post like this and move on, but how do you figure bitcoin "is the only coin that is 100% decentralized"? I've heard tell of a dev team that sold its soul to blockstream and has complete control over the code. Sure, that isn't exactly like one of these idiotic coins that has a DAO, but bitcoin isn't exactly the democracy some people think it is. Or maybe we have different definitions of the term
decentralized.