I don't think there's any doubting the fact that Bitcoin is the king in terms of scarcity. That 21 million cap isn’t just a number if you ask me, it’s what gives Bitcoin its unmatched weight. Altcoins may claim to be scarce but new ones pop up every other day and most don’t have Bitcoin’s trustless and decentralized foundation. With its hard-coded limit and the strongest network behind it, Bitcoin’s scarcity is the real deal. No coin comes close.

 It's like a game of who can manipulate the market the quickest. Shit coins can only gain a certain level of prominence depending on who is hasty to buy and it's still funny that despite it's penchant for failure which these investors know about, you still see them being in a hurry to claim a stake. For me it's criminal to associate Bitcoin in the same sentence as altcoins because we know that these shit coins aren't fit to be in the same competition as Bitcoin. Since the creation of Bitcoin, I bet you that there must have been over 50+ shit coins that have come and gone.
 Its the fact that Bitcoin is scarce that's why it has so much value.

This is not a very correct idea. We've seen not 50, but thousands of shitcoins turn into complete garbage

You can't make money very fast with bitcoin if you need to make money in a short time, to grow your capital or if you have to hurry. Shitcoins are the way to multiply your money in a few weeks. you just have to know when to buy and when to sell, otherwise you have no chance.

sometimes we can make very good money with shitcoins. even if we don't prefer it in the long run, it's a fact

Since the emergence of Bitcoin, if we distinguish it from other coins, then we will be able to understand the value of Bitcoin very easily. Although the shit coins show a dream of high returns for a short time, it becomes dull after a certain time. There are many shit coins that were once in a very good position, but today there is no interest in those coins. Bitcoin will always be at the peak of demand in all areas, past, present, and future. Holding other coins for a long time creates the possibility of losing there, on the other hand, holding Bitcoin reduces its supply and increases its demand. In this way, Bitcoin will become more expensive over time.

Bitcoin remains the king of all crypto, the position unchallenged. No coin that is currently existing or will exist in the future can drag such a position with it, while it leads the market, other coin follows.

However, all shitcoins we know currently, in many years to come, many of them may not be known of again in the market or might have lost its trust by its community members. But for Bitcoin, its popularity and trust keep rising from nation to nation, to be accepted as a store of value that can change someone's financial status in the future.

Altcoins means a lot of shitcoins but bitcoin is just one which makes it more unique due to the limited supply. Those shitcoins devs are only doing it to scam people of their hard earned money and you will still see people rushing into buying the latest shitcoins. I classify buying of shitcoins as gambling because you will definitely run at loss in the long run.

To me due to how reputable and reliable Bitcoin is, I can't even compare Bitcoin to altcoins because they are quite different from each other. Bitcoin is a use case and it's the most adopted cryptocurrency in the market right now which is why I think comparing Bitcoin to shitcoins is far to big to be compared with shits coins.

Many of these shit coins do not even have worth or what they can be used for because they are mostly controlled by scam devs that intend to make money from the crypto market by launching their own projects just to look for investors that would invest and after a while the project will be crashed. A lot of investors have became victims of this due to the greed of making fast profit from the crypto market.

Bitcoin is king in all parameters aside scarcity, let try and keep the word or phrase "shitcoin" aside and assume that all cryptocurrencies are of equal categories or levels, there are several crypto assets with less max supply than bitcoin, I've seen some with max supply less than 20 million, some less than 10 million, some less than 5 million, and I've seen one with 500k as max supply.
Let's assume all cryptocurrencies had equal market cap, this crypto assets terms "shitcoins" with far less max and circulating supply than bitcoin, will be more expensive than bitcoin is...

But then as we all know, Bitcoin is the first successful and the only truly decentralized crypto asset we know today, the rest of the other crypto currencies are referred to as shitcoins because non of them have been able to achieve half of what bitcoin has achieved in all ramifications aside scarcity.

Not enough reason to compare the parameter of scarcity to that of Bitcoin.
The margin of some shitcoin has huge difference on number. Bitcoin is 21m most of the altcoins out there are over 21B and again altcoins with buyback or burn programs rely on the project revenue or token trading fees. If it happens that the profits dry up, no buybacks happen, and supply remains high.

When they learn that they can do that in 2018, (at least that is how far I remember shitcoins) then they blasted the market with it, offering something different that time and many investors fall for it.

But looking back, yeah, maybe there could be a lot of investors who literally profited millions but then again, they could have been back in the market and really thought that it's the way to do it but could have lost that millions as well as developers and the entities behind this shitcoins really play them.